Just Decided Cases

SHELL PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF NIGERIA LIMITED V SAM ROYAL HOTEL NIGERIA LIMITED

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (SC) 46151

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Feb 5, 2016

Suit Number: SC. 120/2006

CORAM


KUDIRAT MOTONMORI OLATOKUNBO KEKERE EKUN    JUSTICE. SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


SHELL PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF NIGERIA LIMITED   APPELLANTS


SAM ROYAL HOTEL NIGERIA LIMITED

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Plaintiff/Respondent filed an action at the Rivers State High Court claiming against the Defendant/Appellant the payment of N7, 021,938.00(Seven Million Twenty-One Thousand, Nine Hundred and Thirty-Eight Naira) as liquidated sum under the undefended list. The Defendant/Appellant having been duly served with the Plaintiff/Respondent’s action failed to file his notice of intention to defend within the time prescribed by law, hence he sought before the court an extension of time within which to file and serve his notice of intention to defend the suit together with the supporting affidavit. After hearing arguments from both parties, the trial court in its considered ruling came to the conclusion that the Defendant/Appellant’s affidavit did not disclosed any defence on merit and judgment was therefore entered in favour of the Plaintiff/Respondent. Dissatisfied with the decision, the Defendant/Appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal which court also affirmed the decision of the trial court. Still aggrieved with the decision, the Defendant/Appellant has further appealed to the Supreme Court wherein he filed his appeal out of time and the notice of Appeal was signed by the Firm of Defendant/Appellant’s counsel.


HELD


Appeal Dismissed


ISSUES


1. Was the lower court right in holding that extension of time to file the notice of intention to defend is in the discretion of the trial judge, which may be exercised only when the defendant has filed not less than 5 days before the day fixed for hearing an affidavit disclosing a defence on the merit?

2. Did the court below not err in law in upholding that the trial judge exercised his discretion in respect of the application for extension of time to file notice of intention to defend?”

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


LEGAL PRACTICE – DUTY OF LEGAL PRACTITIONERS TO MAINTAIN THE STANDARD OF PRACTICE IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION – SECTION 2(1) AND 24 OF THE LEGAL PRACTITIONERS ACT


“Time cannot be more auspicious than now to see to it that the standard of practice in the legal practice is well maintained. It must not be allowed to ebb to an abysmal and embarrassing level. We must ensure that in preparing and filing court processes due diligence and regards must be had to sections 2(1) and 24 of the Legal Practitioners Act (supra). I do not agree with the learned counsel for the Appellant when he submitted that it was an over adherence to technicality to annul the process improperly filed. It is not. With due respect, the learned counsel must not overlook the sense in ensuring that the laws guiding the legal practice are properly observed. This enforcement must begin from here, the apex court. It has been doing so.” PER S. GALADIMA, J.S.C.


LEGAL PRACTICE – DUTY OF LEGAL PRACTITIONERS TO MAINTAIN THE STANDARD OF PRACTICE IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION – SECTION 2(1) AND 24 OF THE LEGAL PRACTITIONERS ACT


“Time cannot be more auspicious than now to see to it that the standard of practice in the legal practice is well maintained. It must not be allowed to ebb to an abysmal and embarrassing level. We must ensure that in preparing and filing court processes due diligence and regards must be had to sections 2(1) and 24 of the Legal Practitioners Act (supra). I do not agree with the learned counsel for the Appellant when he submitted that it was an over adherence to technicality to annul the process improperly filed. It is not. With due respect, the learned counsel must not overlook the sense in ensuring that the laws guiding the legal practice are properly observed. This enforcement must begin from here, the apex court. It has been doing so.” PER S. GALADIMA, J.S.C.


NOTICE OF APPEAL – MEANING OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL – EFFECT OF A DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEAL


“A Notice of Appeal is the spinal cord of an appeal. It is the foundation upon which an appeal is based. It is the originating process which sets the ball rolling for the proper, valid, and lawful commencement of an Appeal. See Agu V. Odofin (1992)3 SCNJ 161, J. A. Aderibigbe & Anor V. Tiamiyu Abidoye (2009) 4SC (Pt 123.)
A valid Notice of Appeal is a condition sine qua non in an appeal. Where it is defective, there shall be no proper, valid and lawful appeal. It cannot stand, it will certainly collapse.” PER S.GALADIMA, J.S.C.


COMPETENCE OF AN APPEAL- REQUIREMENT FOR A COMPETENT APPEAL


“A notice of appeal being the foundation or substratum of every appeal must be competent before an appeal itself can be competent. Any fundamental defect in a notice of appeal also affects the competence of the appeal.” PER J. I. OKORO, J.S.C


NOTICE OF APPEAL – MEANING OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL – EFFECT OF A DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEAL


“A Notice of Appeal is the spinal cord of an appeal. It is the foundation upon which an appeal is based. It is the originating process which sets the ball rolling for the proper, valid, and lawful commencement of an Appeal. See Agu V. Odofin (1992)3 SCNJ 161, J. A. Aderibigbe & Anor V. Tiamiyu Abidoye (2009) 4SC (Pt 123.)
A valid Notice of Appeal is a condition sine qua non in an appeal. Where it is defective, there shall be no proper, valid and lawful appeal. It cannot stand, it will certainly collapse.” PER S.GALADIMA, J.S.C.


SIGNING OF LEGAL DOCUMENT- STATUS OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS NOT SIGNED BY A LEGAL PRACTITIONER


“Any legal document which is to be signed by a legal practitioner, but is signed by any other person, is incompetent and must be discountenanced and struck out. See N. N. B. PLC V. Denclag Ltd (2005) 4 NWLR (pt. 916) 549 at 583, Okafor V. Nweke (2007) ALL FWLR (pt. 368) 1016 at 1018 – 1018, (2007) 10 NWLR (pt 1043) 521 at 523.” PER J. I. OKORO, J.S.C


SIGNING OF LEGAL DOCUMENT- STATUS OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS NOT SIGNED BY A LEGAL PRACTITIONER


“Any legal document which is to be signed by a legal practitioner, but is signed by any other person, is incompetent and must be discountenanced and struck out. See N. N. B. PLC V. Denclag Ltd (2005) 4 NWLR (pt. 916) 549 at 583, Okafor V. Nweke (2007) ALL FWLR (pt. 368) 1016 at 1018 – 1018, (2007) 10 NWLR (pt 1043) 521 at 523.” PER J. I. OKORO, J.S.C


COMPETENCE OF AN APPEAL- REQUIREMENT FOR A COMPETENT APPEAL


“A notice of appeal being the foundation or substratum of every appeal must be competent before an appeal itself can be competent. Any fundamental defect in a notice of appeal also affects the competence of the appeal.” PER J. I. OKORO, J.S.C


LEGAL PRACTITIONERS ACT – PURPOSE OF SECTIONS 2(1) AND 24 OF THE LEGAL PRACTITIONERS ACT


“In interpreting the law, the court is to embark upon positive interpretation. A negative interpretation of the law should be avoided as such is against the canon of interpretation of law. The purpose of sections 2(1) and 24 of the Act is to ensure sanity and responsibility and accountability on the part of a legal practitioner who signs court processes. How else do you separate chaff from the grain – the indolent fake legal practitioners from the genuine, diligent and serious minded legal practitioners?” PER S. GALADIMA, J.S.C.


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO


1. Court of Appeal Rules

2. Evidence Act 2011(As Amended)

3. Legal Practitioners Act 1962(as amended)

4. Legal Practitioners Act Cap L, II, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004.

5. Supreme Court Rules

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Esther ORIAH

Recent Posts

RUFUS ISAAC V OHN ODIGIE IMASUEN

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (SC) 11116 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Jan 29,…

10 hours ago

ZAKI MAMMAN & ORS V MALL. DAN HAJO

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (SC) 18161 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Jan 29,…

11 hours ago

DANIEL OKAFOR V THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (SC) 63952 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Jan 29,…

11 hours ago

DR. OLUBUKOLA ABUBAKAR SARAKI V FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (SC) 10011 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Feb 5,…

11 hours ago

EDWARD NKWEGU OKEREKE V NWEZE DAVID UMAHI & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (SC) 81399 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Feb 5,…

11 hours ago

OBASANJO EGHAREVBA V THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (SC) 11101 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Feb 12,…

12 hours ago