Just Decided Cases

SAMUEL EREKANURE VS THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (1993) Legalpedia (SC) 71711

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jun 11, 1993

Suit Number: SC. 258/1991

CORAM


D.O. EDOZIE

MUHAMMADU LAWAL UWAIS, J.S.C, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT (Presided)

SALIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE, J.S.C, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ABUBAKAR BASHIR WALI, J.S.C, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

JUMMAI HANNATU SANKEY


PARTIES


SAMUEL EREKANURE APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant was arraigned before the trial court on a charge of murder. He was found guilty, convicted and sentenced to death. The appellant appealed on grounds that his arraignment was not in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Law of the Bendel State of Nigeria, 1976.


HELD


The Court held that the first trial was a nullity for non-compliance with Section 215 of the Criminal Procedure Law of Bendel State and also a clear breach of Section 33(6) of the 1979 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The Court also ordered a fresh trial of the appellant.


ISSUES


What is the consequential order to make when a trial Judge fails to adhere strictly to the provisions of Section 215 of the Criminal Procedure Law, Cap. 49, Laws of the Bendel State of Nigeria.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


REASONS FOR ORDERING FRESH TRIAL


The reason for ordering a fresh trial in cases of nullity is the interest of justice where the facts presented were such to allow the appellant to walk out of the court as a free man may amount to a miscarriage of justice more so where the facts showed that an offence had been committed – Olatawura, JSC.


AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD. CALABER VS JOSEPH AGBANYM 1960 FSC 267/1959 [1960] NSCC 12 WHAT CONSTITUTES FAIR TRIAL


A man who does not know or understand the details of the nature of the offence with which he is charged and who was subsequently convicted cannot be said to have had a fair trial – Olatawura, JSC.


CASES CITED


1. Eyorokoromo v. The State (1979) 6-9 S.C. 3.
2. Sunday Kajubo v. The State (1988) 3 S.C. 132; (1988) 1 NWLR (PL73) 721.
3. Abedundu & 4 Ors v. The Queen (1959) 4 F.S.C. 70/1-72: (1959) SCNLR 162.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


1. The Supreme Court Act 1960
2. Criminal Procedure Law, CAP.49 Laws of Bendel State of Nigeria
3. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1979


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

legaladmin

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

5 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

5 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

5 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

5 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

5 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

5 months ago