ROBERT I. IKWEKI V. MR. JAMES EBELE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ROBERT I. IKWEKI V. MR. JAMES EBELE

HERBERT OHUABUNWA EMEZI V. AKUJOBI DAVID OSUAGWU
June 10, 2025
ALHAJI AMINU ISHOLA V. UNION BANK OF NIGERIA LIMITED
June 10, 2025
HERBERT OHUABUNWA EMEZI V. AKUJOBI DAVID OSUAGWU
June 10, 2025
ALHAJI AMINU ISHOLA V. UNION BANK OF NIGERIA LIMITED
June 10, 2025
Show all

ROBERT I. IKWEKI V. MR. JAMES EBELE

Legalpedia Citation: (2005) Legalpedia (SC) 10181

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Feb 18, 2005

Suit Number: SC. 75/1996

CORAM


AKINTOLA OLUFEMI EJIWUNMI JUSTICE,SUPREME COURT

NIKI TOBI JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

DAHIRU MUSDAPHER JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

; DENNIS ONYEJIFE EDOZIE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


1. ROBERT I. IKWEKI 2. JOHN AWOVEJO 3. JAMES EZEWU [For themselves and on behalf of the Enegware Ovwere and Osebakpor families of Ughoton, Okpe Clan] APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellants as plaintiffs based their claim on the interpretation of section 105 of the 1999 constitution prescribing the tenure of the office of the members of the State House of Assembly. The trial judge refused all the claims of the appellant and dismissed their action. Their appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed. They have further appealed.


HELD


Appeal dismissed


ISSUES


NONE


RATIONES DECIDENDI


RIGHTS, POWERS AND LIMITATIONS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION


Once the powers, the rights and the limitations under the Constitution are identified as having been created, their existence cannot be disputed in a Court of law. However, the extent of such powers rights and limitations and their implications may be sought to be interpreted and explained by the Court in cases properly brought before it.


LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES


That in the interpretation of the provisions of statute including the Constitution, where the words of the statute are clear and unambiguous, the words must be given their plain and ordinary meaning. Per MOHAMMED JSC


WHAT GROUNDS OF APPEAL ARE BASED ON


An appeal is usually against the ratio decidendi of the judgment of a lower Court and not in respect of an obiter dicta made by the Court in the course of the said judgment.


CASES CITED


1. Saraki vs. Kotoye (1992) 9 NWLR (Pt. 264) 1562. Attorney General Ondo State vs. Attorney General of the Federation (2002) 9 NWLR (Pt. 772) 2223. Abioye vs. Yakubu (1991) 5 NWLR (Pt. 190) 1304. Odubeko vs. Fowler (1993) 7 NWLR (Pt. 308) 637


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.