Just Decided Cases

PETER OCHUBA VS THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA

Legalpedia Citation: (2016-11) Legalpedia (CA) 11414

In the Court of Appeal

Fri Nov 25, 2016

Suit Number: CA/L/565/2011

CORAM



PARTIES


PETER OCHUBA APPELLANTS


THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Appellant, was initially charged alongside two others (Maxwell Okeke and Benjamin Ahamefule) on a 12 count charge of conspiracy to obtain money by false pretence contrary to sections 8(a) and 1(3) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act No. 13 of 1995 (as amended by Act No. 62 of 1999), obtaining money by false pretence contrary to section 1(3) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act No. 13 of 1995 (as amended by Act No. 62 of 1999) and forgery contrary to section 467(2) (b) and 467(4)(b) of the Criminal Code Cap C.17 Vol.2 Laws of Lagos State of Nigeria 2003. Before the date of arraignment, the Respondent amended the charge to reflect the Appellant alone claiming that the other two persons charged had absconded upon being released on bail. The amended charge is dated 13/2/2007. The Appellant was subsequently arraigned and he pleaded not guilty to the charges. The Respondent opened its case, called six (6) witnesses and tendered sixty-seven (67) exhibits in evidence. At the close of its case, the Appellant made a no case submission which application was overruled by the trial court as lacking in merit. Dissatisfied with the decision, the Appellant has appealed to the Court of Appeal.


HELD


Appeal Dismissed


ISSUES


?    Whether from the facts and circumstances of this case it could be said that the learned trial judge was wrong in assuming jurisdiction to try and determine the criminal charge against the appellant and other accused persons at large for the offences of conspiracy to obtain money by false pretence, obtaining money by false pretence and forgery??    Whether in the light of the evidence adduced and the exhibits tendered it could be said that the learned trial judge was wrong in dismissing the appellants no case submission?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO


Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act No. 13 OF 1995 (As Amended By Act NO. 62 OF 1999)Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999Criminal Code Cap C.17 VOL.2 Laws of Lagos State of Nigeria 2003Criminal Procedure ActCriminal Procedure Law of Lagos State, 2003


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT


Esther ORIAH

Recent Posts

ALHAJI BABATUNDE ALESHINLOYE WILLIAMS & ANOR V ALHAJI SHAMSIDEEN ABAYOMI LABINJO & 0RS

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-03) Legalpedia 52324 (CA) In the Court of Appeal Holden at Lagos Thu…

25 minutes ago

ENNIS OLAYINKA SUNDAY V FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-04) Legalpedia 74353 (CA) In the Court of Appeal Holden at Ibadan Wed…

11 hours ago

ABOBO BAALO v. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (SC) 11101 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Jun 3,…

17 hours ago

MR. OSA OSUNDE VS ECOBANK NIGERIA PLC (FORMERLY OCEANIC BANK INTERNATIONAL PLC)

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (CA) 16151 In the Court of Appeal Thu Jun 9, 2016…

17 hours ago

CHIEF (PRINCE) R.A. OLUSI VS ALHAJI SAIDI SAIDI

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (CA) 17141 In the Court of Appeal Tue Jun 14, 2016…

17 hours ago

B.B. APUGO & SONS LTD vs ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITALS MANAGEMENT BOARD (OHMB)

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (SC) 95111 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Jun 17,…

17 hours ago