PEENOK INVESTMENTS LTD V HOTEL PRESIDENTIAL LTD - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

PEENOK INVESTMENTS LTD V HOTEL PRESIDENTIAL LTD

ONYEMA OKE & ORS V AMOS EKE & ORS
July 24, 2025
GEORGE I. U. OBAYUWANA V GOVERNOR BENDEL STATE
July 24, 2025
ONYEMA OKE & ORS V AMOS EKE & ORS
July 24, 2025
GEORGE I. U. OBAYUWANA V GOVERNOR BENDEL STATE
July 24, 2025
Show all

PEENOK INVESTMENTS LTD V HOTEL PRESIDENTIAL LTD

Legalpedia Citation: (1982) Legalpedia (SC) 10815

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Dec 3, 1982

Suit Number: SC. 79/1981

CORAM


IRIKEFE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OKAY ACHIKE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

IDIGBE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OBASEKI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ESO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

NNAMANI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

UWAIS, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


PEENOK INVESTMENTS LTD APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The defendant through its accredited representative requested of the plaintiff to use the said building as an Annexe to its Hotel at Port-Harcourt known as HOTEL PRESIDENTIAL. They both agreed for a said rent, the defendant used the building but failed to pay the rent.


HELD


Appeal allowed


ISSUES


1. Whether Edicts No. 15 and 17 of 1972 are void on the ground that they were made in bad faith by the then Governor of Rivers State.

2. Ought the plaintiff to have applied to the High Court to join the Rivers State Government as a party to this action before it can properly raise the issues mentioned under item (i) of paragraph 3 of this brief.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


JOINDER OF PARTIES


“The test as to whether there should be joinder of a party in a suit is based on the need to have before the court such parties as would enable it to “effectually and completely adjudicate upon and settle all the questions” in the Suit.” Irikefe, JSC.


THE POSITION OF THE LAW AS TO FOREIGN LAW


“As a general proposition of law, foreign law which would include the laws of the component States in a federation such as ours, is a question of fact which must be pleaded and proved in a trial.” Irikefe, JSC.


CASES CITED


1. Abejide v. Ashiru – 1967 NMLR p. 365.

2. Uku & Ors. v. Okumagba & Ors. (1974) 3 S.C


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Evidence Act

Public Lands Acquisition Law or the State Lands Law

High Court Civil Procedure Rules of Eastern Nigeria (Cap.61)


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.