ONWE ONU & ORS VS OKE AGU & ORS
July 4, 2025OJO ADEBAYO VS MRS. F. IGHODALO
July 4, 2025Legalpedia Citation: (1996) Legalpedia (SC) 13111
In the Supreme Court of Nigeria
HOLDEN AT ABUJA
Mon May 13, 1996
Suit Number: SC. 46/1991
CORAM
A.B. WALI
OLAJIDE OLATAWURA., JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT
M.L. UWAIS, CHIEF JUSTICE, NIGERIA
A.I. IGUH
PARTIES
OJEIFO EIGBEJALE APPELLANTS
EBHOMIENLEN OKEIYERE OKEOKOJIE UWADIALECHIEF AKWETE EHIBOREDOYUGBO DAMENAKHIMIEMONA OKOUGBOUWAHOLEN OKOH (For themselves and on behalf of the people of Ujabhole) RESPONDENTS
AREA(S) OF LAW
SUMMARY OF FACTS
The plaintiff’s case is that it was one Oghaloa, the great grand father of the plaintiff that first deforested and became the founder of Udomi village in Uwessan. By devolution in unbroken chain from father to first son as testified to by the plaintiff, the land of Udomi village, including the land in dispute, devolved on the plaintiff by inheritance under Ishan customary law which the defendants, claimed to be part of their Ujabhole village land.
HELD
The Court upheld decision of the trial court granting the appellant’s claims in respect of statutory right of occupancy to the piece or parcel of land, damages for trespass and perpetual injunction was restored. The appellant is entitled to the costs of this appeal in the sum of N1000.00 in this court and N700.00 in the court below.
ISSUES
“(1) Were the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal right to reverse the finding of the learned trial Judge that the moat marked the boundary between plaintiff’s and defendants’ land? (2) Were the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal right in putting on the plaintiff the burden of proving not only the disputed boundary of the land but all the boundaries of the entire land of plaintiff including areas not in dispute? (3) Were the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal right in their views that in this case, defendant’s acts of possession defeated the appellant’s claim to title? (4) Had the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal justifiable legal basis for reversing the finding of fact made by the learned trial Judge in thus case on the traditional evidence adduced before him?
RATIONES DECIDENDI
CASES CITED
Shitta-Bey v. Federal Public Service Commission (1981) 1 SC 40,|Saude v. Abdullahi (1989) 7 SC NJ 216 at 229:(1989)4 NWLR (Pt. I t6) 387;|Chief Ebba v. Chief Ogodo and Another (1984) 4 SC 84 at 112:|Florence Olusanya v. Olufemi Olasanya (1983) 3 SC 41 at 56-57: (1983) I SCNLR 134
STATUTES REFERRED TO
None.|

