OGOR MICHAEL VS THE QUEEN - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

OGOR MICHAEL VS THE QUEEN

LAYUNJU VS EMMANUEL ARAOYE
September 8, 2025
OKUPE M. A. VS G. O. LAJA
September 8, 2025
LAYUNJU VS EMMANUEL ARAOYE
September 8, 2025
OKUPE M. A. VS G. O. LAJA
September 8, 2025
Show all

OGOR MICHAEL VS THE QUEEN

Legalpedia Citation: (1961-03) Legalpedia 39250 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Lagos

Thu Mar 16, 1961

Suit Number: SC. 330/1960

CORAM


BRETT, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

TAYLOR, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

BAIRAMIAN, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


APPELLANTS


THE QUEEN

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE- INSANITY-EVIDENCE

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

The appellant was tried and convicted despite a medical certificate to the effect that he was of unsound mind and incompetent to stand trial. The trial court had relied on the statement of counsel that he was competent to stand trial.

 


HELD


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

The court held that the lower court ought to have called evidence to establish whether or not the appellant was competent to stand trial and accordingly order a retrial.

 


ISSUES


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

Whether the conviction of the appellant could stand in view of the medical certificate to the effect that he was of unsound mind incompetent to stand trial.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION 1960 FSC 207/1959 [1960] NSCC 41


PRESUMPTION OF SANITY OF ACCUSED PERSONS

‘It is a cardinal principle of our criminal law that no man may be brought to trial on any criminal charge unless and until he is mentally capable fairly of standing his trial. There is a presumption of sanity, but it may be displaced or put in doubt by evidence.’ Per Bairamian F.J

 


CASES CITED


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

Podola, 1959, 3 All E.R. 418

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

The Criminal Procedure Ordinance

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.