Just Decided Cases

NIGERIAN PORTS AUTHORITY VS EPHRAIM ADEWOGA BANJO

Legalpedia Citation: (1972) Legalpedia (SC) 62117

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Thu Mar 30, 1972

Suit Number: SC 64/69

CORAM


ADEMOLA JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MADARIKAN JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SOWEMIMO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


NIGERIAN PORTS AUTHORITY APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The respondent was dismissed from service in breach of express stipulations in his contract with the appellant which allowed him work until he is 60years or a Medical Certificate declares him unfit.


HELD


The court held that the respondent was to continue in service from year to year depending upon a certificate of fitness from a Medical Officer.


ISSUES


Whether paragraph 1505 provides for a retiring age of 60 years when an extension is granted or a retiring age of 56, 57, 58, 59 and 60 years as the case maybe depending upon a medical certificate.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


MEANING OF UNLAWFUL RETIREMENT


“In our view, if it is the latter, as the appellants now claim by the argument of their counsel, it is difficult to agree with the view postulated by counsel that the notice of determination served on the respondent was a valid one. Such notice, in our view, may be given by agreement of parties or for misbehaviour. The respondent was to expect his contract of service to continue from year to year until he reached the age of 60 or until such time before 60 years of age when the Medical Officer certified him as unable to work further. This certainly, in our view, is the correct interpretation that can be given to the old Section 1505. Now, has the amendment of the Section by the insertion therein of the words “at the discretion of the Authority” made any difference? We do not think so. The words, to our mind, cannot be taken to mean that the Authority, during the period of extension, had a right or discretion to terminate the contract by notice, unjustifiably. The discretion the Authority had in the matter, which it could exercise under Section 1505, was whether it would decide to allow a continuation of his service as from 2nd April, 1966. It was clear that what the Authority said in effect was a continuation of his service by the respondent until he was 60 years of age depending upon a certificate of fitness by the Medical Officer from year to year. PER MADARINKA JSC


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO



CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Esther ORIAH

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

3 days ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

3 days ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

3 days ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

3 days ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

3 days ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

3 days ago