NIGERIA NAVY & 2 ORS V LT. COMMANDER S.A. IBE LAMBERT - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

NIGERIA NAVY & 2 ORS V LT. COMMANDER S.A. IBE LAMBERT

ABUBAKAR DAN SHALLA VS THE STATE
May 30, 2025
ANTHONY NWACHUKWU VS THE STATE
May 30, 2025
ABUBAKAR DAN SHALLA VS THE STATE
May 30, 2025
ANTHONY NWACHUKWU VS THE STATE
May 30, 2025
Show all

NIGERIA NAVY & 2 ORS V LT. COMMANDER S.A. IBE LAMBERT

Legalpedia Citation: (2007) Legalpedia (SC) 01981

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Sep 21, 2007

Suit Number: SC. 139/2006

CORAM


FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

NWALI SYLVESTER NGWTA JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

ALOYSIUS IYORGYER KATSINA- , CHIEF JUSTICE OF NIGERIA


PARTIES


1.NIGERIA NAVY

2.CHIEF OF NAVAL STAFF

3. ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION.

APPELLANTS 


LT. COMMANDER S.A. IBE LAMBERT

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The respondent a lieutenant colonel in the Nigerian Navy was tried in a general court martial of 5 count and but convicted and sentenced of one, which is, disobedience to correct standing orders contrary to Section 57(1) of the Armed Forces Decree No. 103 of 1993 as amended. She appealed and her appeal was upheld, she was discharged and acquitted. ?


HELD


The appeal was dismissed. The Supreme Court held that the charge was not proved against the respondent.


ISSUES


1. W hether Exhibit 1, that is to say, the extra-judicial statement made by the respondent is a confessional statement; and if not so, whether the Court of Appeal was not correct in law to hold that in the absence of any credible evidence, count 3 as charged was not proved against the respondent.

2.  Whether the statement by the Court of Appeal that Exhibit 4 among others tendered by the appellants is a public document that needed certification weighed in the mind of the court and/or affected its judgment.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


INGREDIENTS FOR A STATEMENT TO BE CONSIDERED A CONFESSION


In order to amount to a confession, the statement of an accused must be direct, positive and not equivocal. – PER OGUNTADE, JSC


CASES CITED


1. Raimi Afolabi v. Commissioner of Police [1961] All NLR 6542. Nwosu v. Imo State Environmental Sanitation Authority & Ors (1990) 2 NWLR (Part 135) 688 at 723


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.