Just Decided Cases

NIGERIA DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION V. CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA

Legalpedia Citation: (2002) Legalpedia (SC) 01514

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Mar 1, 2002

Suit Number: SC. 55/1999

CORAM


S.M.A. BELGORE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

I.L. KUTIGI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

S.O. UWAIFO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

A.O. EJIWUNMI JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


NIGERIA DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiff (Republic Bank)  instituted action against the CBN for alleged ‘capricious and illegal’ revocation of its banking license particulars of which were not stated.    ?


HELD


The court held that the Federal High Court had no jurisdiction under Section.12 of the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Decree 1991.    ?


ISSUES


1. Whether the learned trial judge had jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiff/respondent action.2.  Whether the learned trial judge was right in holding that the defendant/appellant’s preliminary objection was premature and that it could not have succeeded without an affidavit in support.3.  Whether the Court of Appeal was right in holding that the learned trial judge ought to have struck out the case for want of jurisdiction instead of dismissing it.4.  Whether the Court of Appeal was right to dismissed the cross-appeal filed by the defendant/appellant.?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


JURISDICTION OF COURTS OVER REVOCATION OF BANKING LICENCE


In order that the court may have jurisdiction to entertain an action against revocation of a banking license under Section.12 of the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Decree 1991, the plaintiff has to show or allege bad faith in the way the revocation was done and indicate the elements that constitute the bad faith. This must be done preferably at the threshold of the suit being placed before the court because the court is to presume that the act complained of was done in good faith which naturally will deprive it of jurisdiction unless bad faith is positively alleged by way of its elements – Uwaifo J.S.C


JURISDICTION TO BE SETTLED FIRST WHEN RAISED


A court is not only entitled but bound to put an end to proceedings if at any stage and by any means it becomes manifest that they are incompetent-Uwaifo J.S.C.


CASES CITED


Taiwo v. Akinwunmi (1975) 4 S.C. 143 at 172; Oloyo v. Alegbe (1983) 2 SCNLR 35 Western Steel Works Ltd. v. Iron & Steel Workers Union (1986) 2 NSCC (Vol.17) 786 at 798 Izenilawe v. Nnadozie (1952) 14 WACA36l at 363;Adeyemi v. Opeyori (1976) 9-10 Sc 31; Kashikwu Farms Ltd v. Attorney-General of Bendel State (1986) 1 NWLR (pt.19) 695. Barclays Bank of Nigeria Ltd. v. Central Bank of Nigeria (1976) 1 All NLR 409; Melton Meeds Ltd v. SIB (1995) 3 All ER 880 at 88?


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Banks and Other Financial Institutions Decree 1991


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Esther ORIAH

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

2 days ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

2 days ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

2 days ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

2 days ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

2 days ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

2 days ago