NIGERIA DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (LIQUIDATOR OF ALLIED BANK OF NIGERIA PLC) VS PADUA INVESTMENT NIGERIA LIMITED - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

NIGERIA DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (LIQUIDATOR OF ALLIED BANK OF NIGERIA PLC) VS PADUA INVESTMENT NIGERIA LIMITED

PETER OCHUBA VS THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA
April 17, 2025
MR. MICHAEL KOLADE LAWANSON VS MRS. CECILIA OLA AKUNNA
April 17, 2025
PETER OCHUBA VS THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA
April 17, 2025
MR. MICHAEL KOLADE LAWANSON VS MRS. CECILIA OLA AKUNNA
April 17, 2025
Show all

NIGERIA DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (LIQUIDATOR OF ALLIED BANK OF NIGERIA PLC) VS PADUA INVESTMENT NIGERIA LIMITED

Legalpedia Citation: (2016-11) Legalpedia (CA) 42460

In the Court of Appeal

Fri Nov 4, 2016

Suit Number: CA/L/849/2009

CORAM


OBASEKI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

OBASEKI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

OBASEKI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


NIGERIA DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (LIQUIDATOR OF ALLIED BANK OF NIGERIA PLC)? APPELLANTS


1.    PADUA INVESTMENT NIGERIA LIMITED

2.    CHIEF  M.O. NLEMIGBO

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Appellant as liquidator of Allied Bank of Nigeria filed an action in the Federal High Court against the Respondents for recovery of debt and in particular, claiming as follows: AN ORDER against the Respondents for the immediate payment of the sum of N141,169,534.91 (One Hundred and Forty One Million, One Hundred and Sixty Nine Thousand, Five Hundred and Thirty four Naira, Ninety One Kobo) being outstanding balance and interest thereon, due to the Allied Bank of Nigeria Plc from the facilities granted to the Respondent and Interest on the said sum of N139,864,135.24 (One Hundred and Thirty Nine Million, Eight Hundred and Sixty four Thousand, One Hundred and Thirty five Naira, Twenty kobo) at the rate of 21% per annum until judgment of the Honorable tribunal and thereafter at the rate of 16% until the whole debt is fully liquidated.  At trial, the Appellant called one witness while the Respondent only cross examined the sole witness of the Appellant and did not call any witness. The trial court after due consideration of the evidence adduced by the parties entered judgment in favour of the Respondent and thereby dismissed the claim of Appellant. Being aggrieved by the said decision, the Appellant filed an appeal against same before this court.


HELD


Appeal Allowed


ISSUES


1.    Whether at the trial the Appellant proved her case by preponderance of evidence to entitle her to the reliefs sought as per her Amended Application for Recovery of Debt.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO


Evidence Act


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.