Just Decided Cases

NDOKWU MBEREKPE VS UDOM ADIKES & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (1962-06) Legalpedia 31731 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Lagos

Fri Jun 8, 1962

Suit Number: SC 84/1962

CORAM


ADEMOLA, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

TAYLOR, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

BRETT, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


NDOKWU MBEREKPE

APPELLANTS 


UDOM ADIKES AND ORS

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


CRIMINAL LAW—CASE STATED

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

At a private prosecution charges under the Recognition of Chiefs Law, 1960, objections were taken to the charges, and without hearing any evidence on either side the Magistrate discharged the defendant. Acting under s.32 of the Magistrates’ Courts Law, 1955, the Director of Public Prosecutions required the Magistrate to state a case for the opinion of the High Court

 


HELD


It follows that in this case the order setting aside the Magistrate’s order of discharge and remitting the case to the Magistrate’s Court to be dealt with according to law was made without jurisdiction and was void.

 

 


ISSUES


Made an order setting aside the order of discharge and remitting the case to the Magistrate’s Court to be dealt with according to law. (Whether the High Court Judge was empowered to make this order under case stated)

 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


IMPORTANCE OF CASE STATED


‘Where a case is stated under s.31 of the Magistrates’ Courts Law, that is to say, before the decision of the Magistrate’s Court is pronounced, all that the High Court could appropriately do is to give its opinion on the point of law raised, which is the purpose for which s.31 empowers the Magistrate to state a case.’ Per BRETT F. J.

 

 


CASE STATED UNDER THE MAGISTRATES’ COURTS LAW, 1955


‘Section 32 also empowers a Magistrate to state a case “for the opinion of the High Court”, and there are no grounds for drawing a distinction between cases stated under the two sections or for holding that in a case stated under s.32 the High Court has power to do more than give its opinion. Per BRETT F. J.’

 

 


CONSEQUENCE OF CASE STATED


‘The consequence is that when a case is stated for the opinion of the High Court under s.32 of the Magistrate’s Courts Law, the High Court is restricted to declaring its opinion on the point of law involved and cannot make any consequential order.’ Per BRETT F. J

 

 


CASES CITED


Not Available

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Magistrates’ Courts Law, 1955

The High Court Law

 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

legaladmin

Recent Posts

THE “PROOF-READY” LAWYER: 2026 EVIDENCE PRESERVATION CHECKLIST

A Practice Guide for Litigation, Corporate, and IP/Tech Departments OVERVIEW Under the current Nigerian legal…

7 days ago

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

6 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

6 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

6 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago