MRS MARGARET IFOP V. CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

MRS MARGARET IFOP V. CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA

BADER TABBAA V. O.R. LABABEDI & ANOR
August 11, 2025
SHELL BP PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. V. JAMMAL ENGINEERING NIGERIA LIMITED
August 12, 2025
BADER TABBAA V. O.R. LABABEDI & ANOR
August 11, 2025
SHELL BP PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. V. JAMMAL ENGINEERING NIGERIA LIMITED
August 12, 2025
Show all

MRS MARGARET IFOP V. CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA

Legalpedia Citation: (1974) Legalpedia (SC) 21819

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Thu Apr 18, 1974

Suit Number: SC. 78/1973

CORAM


TASLIM O. ELIAS, CHIEF JUSTICE OF NIGERIA

GEORGE S. SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

DANIEL O. IBEKWE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT br/>


PARTIES


MRS. MARGARET IFOP APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant claimed to have paid a series of money owned in separate aliquot portions by different persons to the respondent for exchange from the old Nigerian Currency to the new Nigerian Currency notes and the defendant failed to exchange. The trial judge non suited the plaintiff.


HELD


The Supreme Court held that there was no specific averment as to the ownership of the moneys in question in the Statement of Claim, to which the Statement of Defence is required to make a specific denial in accordance with the rules of pleading. The Judgment of the High Court was upheld including the order costs.


ISSUES


Whether the learned trial Judge erred in law in failing to enter judgment for the plaintiff when the material facts in the Statement of Claim have not been denied in the Statement of defence.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


STATEMENT OF DEFENCE


“The rule of pleading only requires the defendant to deny specifically what is clearly stated by the plaintiff in the Statement of Claim – Per Elias, CJN


CASES CITED


Grocott v. Lovatt & Anor. (1916) WN 317


STATUTES REFERRED TO



CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.