MICHAEL IMUODU & ORS. VS THE QUEEN - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

MICHAEL IMUODU & ORS. VS THE QUEEN

OLAGUNJU SHITTA VS THE QUEEN
September 10, 2025
CIGARI SHEHU VS J. B. OGEDENGBE
September 10, 2025
OLAGUNJU SHITTA VS THE QUEEN
September 10, 2025
CIGARI SHEHU VS J. B. OGEDENGBE
September 10, 2025
Show all

MICHAEL IMUODU & ORS. VS THE QUEEN

Legalpedia Citation: (1961-01) Legalpedia 14636 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Lagos

Sat Jan 21, 1961

Suit Number: S.C. 159/1960

CORAM


BRETT, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

HURLEY, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

BELLAMY, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


APPELLANTS


THE QUEEN

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

CHARGES- CRIMINAL LAW -EVIDENCE-ASSAULT-RIOTING

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

The appellants were charged for rioting an assault, the evidence revealed two incidents of rioting with one of which the appellant did not participate and there was no evidence of who committed the assault.

 


HELD


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

The court held that the fact that evidence of two incidents of rioting was led despite the charge for one did not prejudice the appellants but that the charge for assault was not proved.

 


ISSUES


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

Whether the charge of rioting offended against the provisions of s. 156 of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance and the rule in R. v. Achie.

Whether the High court was right in convicting the appellants for assault

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION 1960 FSC 207/1959 [1960] NSCC 41


VALIDITY OF A CRIMINAL CHARGE.

‘The rule laid down in section 156 and the case of R. v. Achie does not apply where a charge is valid on the face of it.’ Per Brett F J

 


CASES CITED


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

R. v. Achie (1947) 12 W A.C.A. 209

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

The Criminal Procedure Ordinance

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.