Just Decided Cases

MARCUS OPUIYO V & 2 ORS V. JOHNSON OMONIWARI & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2007) Legalpedia (SC) 47501

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jun 8, 2007

Suit Number: SC. 131/2002

CORAM


ANTHONY IKECHUKWU IGUH, JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


1. MARCUS OPUIYO

2. SOTONYE OPUIYO

3. MICHAEL OPUIYO [For themselves and as representing theAMASO family of Ogoloma, Okrika).

APPELLANTS 


 JOHNSON OMONIWARI & ANOR

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The  appeal is against the concurrent findings fo the lower courts to the effect that the appellants failed to proof their title to the land in dispute. The Supreme Court held inter alia as hereinbelow stated.


HELD


Appeal dismissed


ISSUES


Was there a miscarriage of justice to the fair and proper hearing of the appellants’ case in the treatment of only one (1) narrow issue by the Hon. Justices of the Court of Appeal instead of all the material issues raised by the parties and does this vitiate the judgment of the said Court of Appeal?Was the Court of Appeal right to have ignored the complaint ab initio of the appellants that the learned Judge’s adopted approach did not conform with law particularly the guidelines in Mogaji v. Odofin [1978] 4 S.C. 91 at 93/95.Whether this appeal is competent having regard to the failure of the appellants to obtain leave of this Honourable Court or the Court below in accordance with section 233(3) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999.Whether the solitary issue considered by the Court of Appeal regarding the trial court’s evaluation of evidence of traditional history in this case is enough and necessary to dispose of this appeal. ?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


NEED TO OBTAIN LEAVE TO APPEAL ON GROUNDS OF MIXED LAW AND FACT


“It is now settled law that this court cannot hear an appeal on grounds of mixed law and fact unless leave of the court or the Court of Appeal has been obtained”. (Per Oguntade JSC)


CASES CITED


1. Ojemen v. Momodu [1983] 1 SCNLR 1882. Customs v. Barau 1982 10S.C. 483. Mogaji v. Odofin (1978) 4 S. C. 91 at 93/95.4. Madukolu & Ors. v. Nkemdilim [1962] All NLR (Pt. 2) 581 at 589-590.5. Oluwole v. L.S.D.P.C. [1983] 5S.C.I and 6. Adejumo v. State [1983] 5 S.C.24


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

legaladmin

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

4 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

4 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

4 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 months ago