MALLAM YUSUF JIMOH VS MALLAM KARIMU AKANDE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

MALLAM YUSUF JIMOH VS MALLAM KARIMU AKANDE

SAMUEL OSIGWE VS PSPLS MANAGEMENT CONSORTIUM LTD
May 28, 2025
SHELL PETROLEUM DEV. CO. LTD V CHIEF VICTOR SUNDAY OLAREWAJU
May 28, 2025
SAMUEL OSIGWE VS PSPLS MANAGEMENT CONSORTIUM LTD
May 28, 2025
SHELL PETROLEUM DEV. CO. LTD V CHIEF VICTOR SUNDAY OLAREWAJU
May 28, 2025
Show all

MALLAM YUSUF JIMOH VS MALLAM KARIMU AKANDE

Legalpedia Citation: (2009-01) Legalpedia 33524 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Abuja

Tue Jan 13, 2009

Suit Number: SC 159/2002

CORAM


A I KATSINA-ALU, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

A M MUKHTAR, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

M MOHAMMED, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

F F TABAI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

C M. CHUKWUMA-ENEH (Lead Judgment), JUSTICE SUPREMME COURT


PARTIES


1. MALLAM YUSUF JIMOH

2. MALLAM RAIMI ALAPARUN

3. MALLAM YISA ALAPARUN

APPELLANTS 


1. ALHAJI ISHOLA AREOGELE

2. MALLAM KARIMU AKANDE

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


RES JUDICATA – APPEALS – JURISDICTION

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant as plaintiff claimed damages for trespass against the respondent and the respondent counter-claimed for ownership and pleaded res judicata. The respondent’s contention was upheld by the High Court sitting in its appellate jurisdiction. The Court of Appeal affirmed the decision of the High Court. The appellant has further appealed

 

 


HELD


Appeal dismissed

 

 


ISSUES


1.This appeal is poised to be resolved on determining the sole issue of Res judicata without more.?

 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


WHEN LEAVE IS A PRE-CONDITION IT MUST BE OBTAINED


Appeals to the court on questions of mixed law and facts or facts alone in which case, leave is a pre-condition, have to be predicated on a prior leave obtained from the court below or the court. Per CHUKWUMA-ENEH, JSC

 

 


EFFECT OF PLEADING RES JUDICATA


Where the principle of Res judicata has been pleaded in a case that its full effect is to oust the jurisdiction of the court to hear the present matter before it as it is predicated on issue(s) or subject matter that has been adjudicated upon previously. Per CHUKWUMA-ENEH, JSC

 

 


CASES CITED


1.   Ojemen v. Momodu II & Ors. (1983) NSCC 135

2.   Nwajueba v. Ahabua & Anor. (1974) NSCC (Vol.9) 617

3.   Innocent Ibero and Anor. v. Unte-Ohana (1993) 2 NWLR (Pt.277) 510

 

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


1.   Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999

 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.