MAJOR I. Z. UMORU (RTD) V ALHAJI ABUBAKAR ZIBIRI AND ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

MAJOR I. Z. UMORU (RTD) V ALHAJI ABUBAKAR ZIBIRI AND ORS

GENERAL MUHAMMADU BUHARI V ALHAJI MOHAMMED DIKKO YUSUF
June 13, 2025
AYMAN ENTERPRISES LIMITED VS AKUMA INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ORS
June 16, 2025
GENERAL MUHAMMADU BUHARI V ALHAJI MOHAMMED DIKKO YUSUF
June 13, 2025
AYMAN ENTERPRISES LIMITED VS AKUMA INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ORS
June 16, 2025
Show all

MAJOR I. Z. UMORU (RTD) V ALHAJI ABUBAKAR ZIBIRI AND ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (2003) Legalpedia (SC) 15197

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jun 27, 2003

Suit Number: SC. 123/1999

CORAM


SALIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

WALTER SAMMUEL NKANU ONNOGHEN, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


1. MAJOR I. Z. UMORU (RTD)2. USMAN MOHAMMED (FOR THEMSELVES AND ON BEHALF OF IVBIOKHULATOR RULING HOUSE IVBIORA) APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The dispute in this case concerned the village headship of Ivbiaro village in Owan Local Government Area of Bendel State. The Ivbiaro village consists of four quarters namely-Ivbiokhulotor, Usun, Ivbioshogun and Ebese quarters. Each of the four quarters is subdivided into four kindreds.


HELD


The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decisions of the courts below.


ISSUES


1. Whether the Court of Appeal was right in holding that, the learned trial judge was right in rejecting the evidence led by the appellants that Okhulotor was the eldest son of Aro… That there was an agreement among the Quarters that the village Head of Ivbiaro should always be selected from the descendants of Okhulotor.
2. Whether the Court of Appeal was right to have held that it was not necessary to institute a public inquiry into the Headship of Ivbiaro Headship before 1st Respondent was appointed.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


PROPER EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE


“It is well settled that a trial judge who sees and hears the witnesses giving evidence before him, has the exclusive right to assess their demeanour so as to determine whether they are telling the truth or not. He can, in this way, determine the credibility or otherwise of the testimony of every witness who testifies before him. If this is done properly, it is not for the appeal court to interfere in any way possible.” Kalgo JSC


MEANING OF MISDIRECTION


“A misdirection is itself an error as it entails following a “wrong direction.” It can also be of law or fact. It is also common ground that you almost always apply the law to a certain sets of facts.” Kalgo JSC


CASES CITED


1. Metal Construction (W. A.) Ltd V. Migliore & Ors (1990) 1 NWLR (pt. 126) 299
2. Nwadike V. Ibekwe (1987) 4 NWLR (part. 67) 718
3. Ogbechie V. Onochie (1986) 2 BWLR (part. 23) 484


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.