LATEEF BABATUNDE AJAO VS THE PERMANENT SECRETARY,MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC PLANNING BUDGET CIVIL SERVICE PENSIONS OFFICE. - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

LATEEF BABATUNDE AJAO VS THE PERMANENT SECRETARY,MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC PLANNING BUDGET CIVIL SERVICE PENSIONS OFFICE.

B.B. APUGO & SONS LTD vs ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITALS MANAGEMENT BOARD (OHMB)
April 18, 2025
COSCHARIS MOTORS LTD VS CAPITAL OIL AND GAS LTD
April 18, 2025
B.B. APUGO & SONS LTD vs ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITALS MANAGEMENT BOARD (OHMB)
April 18, 2025
COSCHARIS MOTORS LTD VS CAPITAL OIL AND GAS LTD
April 18, 2025
Show all

LATEEF BABATUNDE AJAO VS THE PERMANENT SECRETARY,MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC PLANNING BUDGET CIVIL SERVICE PENSIONS OFFICE.

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (CA) 21715

In the Court of Appeal

Tue Jun 14, 2016

Suit Number: CA/L/922/2010

CORAM



PARTIES


LATEEF BABATUNDE AJAO? APPELLANTS


THE PERMANENT SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC PLANNING BUDGET CIVIL SERVICE PENSIONS OFFICE.THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF LAGOS STATE? RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Claimant/Appellant who was in the service of Lagos State Government for over 31 years retired as a Permanent Secretary on the 1st of August 2002. Upon failure of the 1st Defendant to pay his pension and gratuity after several correspondences via his lawyers, he instituted an action before the Lagos State High Court claiming a declaration that the unnecessary withholding of his terminal benefits is wrongful, null and void,  an order that the Defendants pay the terminal benefits calculated in the sum of N247,000.00 monthly salary from 1st August 2002 the gratuity will be N8,892,000.00 (Eight Million Eight Hundred and Ninety Two Thousand Naira) and the pension arrears from 1st August 2002 to 31st March 2008 in the sum of N16,796,000.00 (Sixteen Million Seven Hundred and Ninety Six Thousand Naira), the total sum being N25, 688,000.00 (Twenty Five Million Six Hundred and Eight Thousand Naira) with interest at the rate of 20% per annum will be N52, 070, l 15.00 (Fifty Two Million Seven Thousand One Hundred and Fifteen Naira). The Claimant/Appellant also sought the sum of N5,000,000 (Five Million Naira) being general damages for the psychological trauma and untold hardship the delay in the payment of the Claimant’s terminal benefits. Pleadings were exchanged by the parties. The Defendants relying on section 2(a) of the Public Officer Protection Law, Cap P26 Laws of Lagos State, filed a notice of preliminary objection contending that the Claimant/Appellant’s action was statute barred. The trial court upheld the objection hence the instant appeal.


HELD


Appeal Allowed


ISSUES


?    Whether having regard to the right to pension guaranteed under the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the circumstances of the instance case, the learned trial judge was right when he held that the Appellant’s action is caught by the provision of section 2(a) of the Public Officer Protection Law, Cap P26 Laws of Lagos State?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO


Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended)Limitation Law of Lagos State, Cap L67 Laws of Lagos State 2003

Pensions Act 1974

Public Officer Protection Law, Cap P26 Laws of Lagos State

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.