LAMIDI OGBO FAKOYA VS ST. PAUL'S CHURCH, SHAGAMU - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

LAMIDI OGBO FAKOYA VS ST. PAUL’S CHURCH, SHAGAMU

ARNOLD NWAFIA VS NWANAKUO UBUBA
September 2, 2025
OMUFEREN UYOVBARIA AND ORS VS CHIEF M. KPOROARO AND ANOR
September 2, 2025
ARNOLD NWAFIA VS NWANAKUO UBUBA
September 2, 2025
OMUFEREN UYOVBARIA AND ORS VS CHIEF M. KPOROARO AND ANOR
September 2, 2025
Show all

LAMIDI OGBO FAKOYA VS ST. PAUL’S CHURCH, SHAGAMU

Legalpedia Citation: (1966-03) Legalpedia 48789 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden At Abuja

Fri Mar 4, 1966

Suit Number: SC 238/1964


CORAM


BRETT JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ONYEAMA JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

AJEGBO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


LAMIDI OGBO FAKOYA

APPELLANTS 


ST. PAUL’S CHURCH, SHAGAMU

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


LAND LAW-SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE-EQUITY 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

This is an appeal against the judgment of the Western Region High Court granting specific performance of a contract for the sale of land, and directing the original appellant, Lamidi Ogbo Fakoya, to execute a conveyance of the land to the respondents. 

 


HELD


That the personal obligations created by a contract for the sale of land are already known to the parties to the contract and neither party can maintain against the other party that he was taken by surprise because the contract was not registered. 

 


ISSUES


Whether Exhibit A was rightly admitted or not? 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


MEANING OF SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE-


The basis of the remedy of specific performance is not the conversion of an equitable interest into a legal interest, but the enforcement of a contract where damages would not afford a complete remedy, and although specific performance is more frequently granted where the contract is for the sale of land than in other cases, this is not because of any distinction between the jural nature of a right to purchase land and other contractual rights but because damages are less often a complete remedy for the breach of a contract for the sale of land than for the breach of other contracts. Per Brett, J.S.C.

 


CASES CITED


South Eastern Railway Co. v. Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers [ 1910] 1 Ch.
Hutton v. Walling [1948] Ch. 26

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO



CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.