JOSEPH EKWERE & ORS VS NAKMAKOSI IYIEGBU & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

JOSEPH EKWERE & ORS VS NAKMAKOSI IYIEGBU & ORS

FRANCIS A. ODIETE & ANOR VS OMAMUJEWHE OKOTIE & ORS
August 19, 2025
UMARU BUYU VS THE STATE
August 19, 2025
FRANCIS A. ODIETE & ANOR VS OMAMUJEWHE OKOTIE & ORS
August 19, 2025
UMARU BUYU VS THE STATE
August 19, 2025
Show all

JOSEPH EKWERE & ORS VS NAKMAKOSI IYIEGBU & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1972) Legalpedia (SC) 11118

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jun 16, 1972

Suit Number: SC.535/65

CORAM


COKER JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

FATAYI-WILLIAMS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SOWEMIMO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


JOSEPH EKWEREEJIOFOR ONYEKELUISIBA ENWERE (For themselves and on behalf of the people of Amaogbu family, Umuaku, Okigwi division.)OTU AZOROOHAERI ANYAOHA (For themselves and on behalf of the people of Obagu quarter of Umuaku, Okigwi Division.)AKABUIKE MADUNWOBI ONWUZURU (For themselves and on behalf of Amakpoke quarter of Umuaku, Okigwi Division.) APPELLANT(S) / DEFENDANT(S)


PLAINTIFFS / RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiffs are the people of Okpu family of Owerre village in Awka Division. The defendants are the people of Amaogbu, Obagu and Amakpoke families of Umuaka village in Okigwi Division. The plaintiffs own the land in dispute which the defendants also claim ownership.


HELD


The Court held that the appeal is allowed and the judgment of the Onitsha High Court, including the order as to costs, in Suit No. 0/91/59 delivered on 8th April, 1963, is hereby set aside.


ISSUES


Whether having admitted that the defendants/appellants used to farm on the land in dispute with their permission, the plaintiffs/respondents could maintain claims for trespass and injunction.

Whether they had failed to prove the eastern boundary of their land and if so, what effect this failure should have on their claim.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


PROOF OF TRESPASS


“It is trite law that in order to succeed in a claim for trespass a plaintiff must prove that he is in actual possession of the land in dispute.” FATAYI-WILLIAMS, JSC.


CASES CITED


Oluwi v. Eniola (1967) NMLR p. 339 at 340

Banjo v.Fasanya SC. 315/1967

Lawal v. Adeola SC. 187/1967 delivered 25/9/70)

Sanni v. Oki SC.199/1968 delivered on 26/3/71

Aremu v. Akanji SC. 86/1970 delivered on 29/10/70


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Native Courts Ordinance (Cap. 142 of the Laws of Nigeria, 1948)


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.