JIMOH AILERU AND OTHERS VS ADEMUOYE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

JIMOH AILERU AND OTHERS VS ADEMUOYE

IGE KARIMU VS ABRAHAM OBIWALE
August 29, 2025
PHILLIPS B HENRY VS JOSEPH O. OGUNDIPE
August 29, 2025
IGE KARIMU VS ABRAHAM OBIWALE
August 29, 2025
PHILLIPS B HENRY VS JOSEPH O. OGUNDIPE
August 29, 2025
Show all

JIMOH AILERU AND OTHERS VS ADEMUOYE

Legalpedia Citation: (1967-12) Legalpedia 31116 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

LAGOS

Fri Dec 1, 1967

Suit Number: SC.416/1965

CORAM


ADEMOLA CHIEF JUSTICE, NIGERIA

BREET JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MADARIKAN JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


JIMOH AILERU AND OTHERS

APPELLANTS 


ADEMUOYE (DECD.) substituted by MUYIBATU ADEMUOYE AND OTHERS

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


LAND LAW – LAW OF EQUITY-ACQUIESCENCE

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellants knowingly stood by while the respondent developed the land in dispute which the respondent bought from persons who had no authority to sell the land. They subsequently claimed for title, trespass, injunction and possession. The respondent did not counter-claim.

 

 


HELD


The court held that the respondent had acquired equity in the land and adjourned proceedings for the appellants to offer the defendant compensation for the expense he has incurred or for the respondent to counter-claim for a conveyance and pay for the land.

 

 


ISSUES


1 Whether the lower court was right in granting the appellants title but refusing their claim for trespass, possession and injunction.

2 Whether the lower court was right to have granted the appellants title after finding that they acquiesced to the respondent’s possession.

 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


COURT’S ROLE WHILE CONSIDERING APPLICATIONS FOR DECLARATION OF TITLE


1. ‘The grant of a declaration of title is a matter for the court’s discretion, and that it should certainly not be made as a matter of course.’ Per Brett J.S.C

 

 

 


COURT’S ROLE WHILE CONSIDERING APPLICATIONS FOR DECLARATION OF TITLE.


 

2. ‘In exercising a discretionary power in such a case as this the court should try to make an order that will settle the rights of the parties finally.’ Per Brett J.S.C

 

 


CASES CITED


1. Plimmer v. The Mayor of Wellington (1884) 9 App, Cas. 699, at pp. 713-714

2. Ramsden v. Dyson (1866) L.R. 1 H.L. 129

3. Duke of Beaufort v. Patrick 17 Beav. 60

4. Duke of Beaufort v. Patrick 17 Beav. 60, 51 E. R. 954

5. Oluwo v. Adebowale (1964) N.M.L.R. 17

 

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO



CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.