Just Decided Cases

INCAPINT LIMITED v. KEBBI STATE GOVERNMENT

Legalpedia Citation: (2018-07) Legalpedia 96010 (CA)

In the Court of Appeal

HOLDEN AT SOKOTO

Thu Jul 12, 2018

Suit Number: CA/S/70M/2016(R)

CORAM


HUSSEIN MUKHTAR, JUSTICE COURT OF APPEAL

MUHAMMED LAWAL SHUAIBU, JUSTICE COURT OF APPEAL

FREDERICK OZIAKPONO OHO, JUSTICE COURT OF APPEAL


PARTIES


APPELLANTS


KEBBI STATE GOVERNMENT

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


APPEAL, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Appellant brought an application vide a Motion on Notice wherein it sought for leave to amend its Notice of Appeal and brief of argument, file and argue additional ground of Appeal, and a deeming order. In reaction, the Respondent filed a Counter Affidavit in opposition.

 


HELD


Application Granted

 


ISSUES


1. Whether the court can grant the prayers of the Appellant/Applicant as contained on the motion filed on 12th February, 2018.

2. Whether the Respondent would be prejudiced with the grant of this application.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


AMENDMENT OF NOTICE OF APPEAL – RIGHT OF A PARTY TO AMEND ITS PROCESSES WHEN NECCESSARY IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THE ISSUES IN DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PARTIES


“The law is trite that there is no limit to seek leave to amend process before the Court. See Flemincdon Dev. Nic. Ltd. V Aneamene (2006) ALL FWLR (3001) 1915, where the Court held thus:

Amendment of a notice of appeal or any process can be done at any time as allowed by the rules of the Court. Order 6 Rule 15 of the Court of Appeal Rules gives power to the Court to allow the amendments of a notice of appeal at anytime.”

The Supreme Court per Ariwoola, JSC in SALISU V. MOBOLAJI (2014) 7 W.R.N Pp. 72-73 lines 40-15 held thus:

“There is no rule of the Supreme Court that limits the number of times a party can bring an application to regularize the processes in Court in particular, application to amend processes already filed even when the matter is fixed for hearing. As long as the purpose of or reason for such amendment is to ensure that the complaints of the appellants against the proceedings in question are laid and ventilated before the Court. Indeed, the fact that briefs of argument have been filed and exchanged and the appeal is virtually ready or has been fixed for hearing will not prevent the Court from exercising its undoubted discretion to allow an amendment both to the notice and grounds of appeal and the brief of argument. The important consideration must be that the amendment would serve the ends of justice and fairness … ”

This particular ground sought to be added actually brought out one of the issues in dispute at the Court below. Moreover, the Respondent would not, in anyway, be overreached since they would have the opportunity of arguing or responding to the Appellants arguments predicated upon the additional ground.

The Respondent has not shown how it will be prejudiced by the grant of this application.

In any case, the additional ground of appeal sought to be added emanated from the proceedings of the Court below and the reason for this amendment is for the Court to hear the complaints of the appellant challenging the findings of the lower Court.

The Respondent reserves the right to make consequential amendments to the respondent’s brief of argument. There is nothing in the Respondents counter affidavit that shows any likely prejudice that would result from granting this application.

The Supreme Court in Hauma Hassan Tukur Vs Garba Umar and 7 Ors (2012) LPELR-9337 9(SC) held:

“An appellant is equally entitled to amend an original notice of appeal as at when necessary. In other words, an appellant can amend his notice of appeal to incorporate the grounds in the other notice(s).”

From the foregoing appraisal, it will serve better interest of justice to allow the application in order to determine the issues in dispute between the parties. – PER H. MUKHTAR, J.C.A

 


AMENDMENT OF NOTICE OF APPEAL – WHETHER SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES IS NECESSARY TO JUSTIFY AN AMENDMENT OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL


“The procedure for leave to amend notice of appeal is provided in the Court of Appeal Rules and show of special circumstances is unnecessary to justify an amendment. The discretion of the Court to grant it is unhampered provided it is done faithfully to ventilate the parties grievances in the appeal. The powers of the Court to order amendments and generally to make orders as are necessary to produce a just result extend to amendment of notice of appeal and brief of argument. – PER H. MUKHTAR, J.C.A

APPEAL, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

 

 


AMENDMENT OF NOTICE OF APPEAL – WHETHER THE PROCEDURE FOR LEAVE TO AMEND A NOTICE OF APPEAL REQUIRES THE SHOW OF SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES TO JUSTIFY SUCH AMENDMENT


“I am in agreement with the reasoning and conclusions reached in granting the application as meritorious. I am in agreement that the procedure for leave to amend notice of appeal does not require the show of special circumstances to justify an amendment. The discretion of the Court to grant it is unfettered provided it is exercised judicially and judiciously. – PER F. O. OHO, J.C.A

 


CASES CITED


Not Available

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Court of Appeal Rules, 2016

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Esther ORIAH

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

5 days ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

5 days ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

5 days ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

5 days ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

5 days ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

5 days ago