FRANKLIN O. ATANDA V. ALLI AKANMI
August 12, 2025CHIEF D.O. OGUGUA VS ARMELS TRANSPORT LTD
August 12, 2025Legalpedia Citation: (1974-03) Legalpedia (SC) 73156
In the Supreme Court of Nigeria
Fri Mar 22, 1974
Suit Number: SC. 322/1972
CORAM
ELIAS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT
IRIKEFEJUSTICE, SUPREME COURT
IRIKEFE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT
PARTIES
CHRISTIANA ABOSEDE WILLIAMS
APPELLANTS
OLADAPO WILLIAMS
OLAWALE ONILE ERE (M)
IN RE OLAWALE ONILE ERE
RESPONDENTS
AREA(S) OF LAW
MATRIMONIAL CAUSES-DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE – DAMAGES
SUMMARY OF FACTS
The Respondent (husband) got damages against the party cited (person with whom adultery was committed) in the dissolution of his marriage on the grounds of adultery. The party cited appealed against the award of damages because the Judge did not make a finding as to whether the adultery was committed within three years prior to the proceeding.
HELD
The appeal was allowed and the cost awarded as damages was set aside and the claim for damages was dismissed. It was held that the trial judge was in error in awarding damages against the person cited in the absence of any finding that the adultery was committed by the petitioner within the statutory period.
ISSUES
Whether the trial Judge was in error to have awarded damages against the party cited without making a finding that the adultery on which the claim for damages was based was committed within three years of the date of the petition
RATIONES DECIDENDI
PROOF OF ADULTERY COMMITED WITHIN 3YEARS OF PETITION:
“no damages can be awarded in respect of an adultery committed more than three years before the date of the petition. Moreover, in our view, the onus of proving the particular adultery relied upon by a petitioner for his or her claim for damages under Section 31(1) lies squarely on such petitioner and must be proved to the satisfaction of the court. In addition, because of the mandatory provisions of subsection (3), the court hearing the petition or cross-petition, as the case may be, must make a clear finding as to whether that adultery was or was not committed within a period of three years preceding the date of the petition for divorce.” Per FATAYI-WILLIAMS, JSC
CASES CITED
Emegokwe v. Okadigbo (1973) 4 S.C. 113
Evans v. Evans and Platts (1899) p.195
STATUTES REFERRED TO
S.31 (1)&(3) of Matrimonial Causes Decree, 1970

