Just Decided Cases

ILIYASU UMAR VS BAYERO UNIVERSITY, KANO

Legalpedia Citation: (1988-07) Legalpedia 79549 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

HOLDEN AT LAGOS

Fri Jul 8, 1988

Suit Number: SC. 85/1986

CORAM



PARTIES


ILIYASU UMAR

APPELLANTS 


BAYERO UNIVERSITY, KANO

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


CIVIL PROCEDURE – TORT – NEGLIGENCE – RETRIAL

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant at the trial court sued the defendant for the damage caused by the negligence of the servant of the defendant for causing a fire which burnt down the two flats in a building of one storey containing two flats each on ground floor and first floor respectively. There is no dispute that a fire engulfed two flats However, the parties’ dispute the cause of the fire outbreak.

 


HELD


That the parties must be afforded the opportunity of having the points in dispute between them re-tried.

 


ISSUES


Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to relist an appeal that it has dismissed for non-appearance of the parties at the hearing of the appeal.

Whether in all the circumstances of the case, the Court of Appeal ought not to have made an Order for a retrial of the suit in view of the fact that it held that the trial judge failed to resolve the main issue upon which the evidence of the witnesses at the trial turned by a visit to the locus in quo.

Whether the comments made in passing on the case particularly in respect of Exhibit 1 and 1A and Exhibit 3 by the Court of Appeal did not adversely affect the Appellant’s case even though the Court of Appeal pointed out that these issues have not been taken into consideration in reaching the decision to allow the appeal of the Respondent.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


RETRIAL.


‘Where the vital issues are left unappraised by the trial court and this has led to inconclusive review of the evidence of the parties, the duty of the appellate court is to allow the appeal. But that is not all, the parties must be afforded the opportunity of having the points in dispute between them re-tried and a retrial is the only remedy.’ Per S.M.A. Belgore J.S.C.

 


CASES CITED


Chief James Okpiri& Ors. Vs. Chief Igoni Jonah & Ors. (1961) 1 AII NLR. 102

Obadara & Ors. vs. President, Ibadan West District Court (1964) 1 AII NLR. 336

Total v. Nwaka (1978) 5 SC. 1, 14

Taiwo Okeowo & Ors. vs. D. Alessandra Miglore & Ors. (1979) 11 SC. 177, 201

Oladipo Maja vs. Learndro Stocco (1968) NMLR. 173.Kuti vs. Balogun (1978) 1 LRN. 333,357

T.O. Kuti (Trading as Abusi Odumare Transport) vs. O. Jibowu (1972) 5 SC. 747).

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE|

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

legaladmin

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

6 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

6 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

6 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago