ICHIE ANOGHALU & ORS VS NATHAN ORAELOSI & ANOR - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ICHIE ANOGHALU & ORS VS NATHAN ORAELOSI & ANOR

ONYIA NWAGWU NGWU & ORS. V. UGWU ONUIGBO & ORS.
June 27, 2025
AKAAER JOV VS KUTUKU DOM
June 27, 2025
ONYIA NWAGWU NGWU & ORS. V. UGWU ONUIGBO & ORS.
June 27, 2025
AKAAER JOV VS KUTUKU DOM
June 27, 2025
Show all

ICHIE ANOGHALU & ORS VS NATHAN ORAELOSI & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (1999) Legalpedia (SC) 81333

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Oct 8, 1999

Suit Number: SC. 187/1993

CORAM


A.B. WALI – JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

M.E. OGUNDARE – JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

PIUS OLAYIWOLA ADEREMI, JSC (Lead Judgment)


PARTIES


ICHIE JEROME ANOGHALU ICHIE BONIEFACE IWUNZEICHIE ERNEST UNADIKE NZE OBIDIOKPU UNlGWE (For themselves and on behalf of Ubahuabu Ubahu village minus Umunnabala family)   APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellants appealed against the discharge of an interim order they had gotten against the respondents at the trial court.


HELD


The court held that ground I raised a question of fact and that the plaintiffs/respondents having failed to seek and obtain leave to appeal from either the High Court or the Court of Appeal, that ground of appeal was rightly struck out and that the 2nd ground is vague and discloses no cause of action.


ISSUES


Whether the ground of appeal stated thus. The Court erred in law by making an order to strike out the words ‘for themselves and on behalf of Uhahuabu-Ubahu Village minus Umunnabala family’ from the title of the suit since on the authority of Otapo v. Sunmonu …. the plaintiff sue in their personal capacities without expression on the writ the capa they have brought the action’ is a question of law, or of mixed law and fact. Whether or not the ground of appeal based on section 220(1) (g) (ii) lacks merit since the learned trial Judge based his reason on the fact that the appellants had no mandate; that mandate being on issue of fact requires leave.”


RATIONES DECIDENDI


WHAT AN ERROR IN LAW IS


“An error in law is where the appellant is complaining of the failure of the Court to apply the correct principles of law to established and undisputed facts or that the Court has come to a conclusion on admitted or proved facts which no reasonable tribunal would have come to. -Ogundare JSC


CASES CITED


Otapo v. Sunmonu & Ors. (1987) 5 SC. 228Azubike Ume & Others v. Alfred Ezechi & Ors. (1962) ANLR (Pt. 1) 16Akwiwu Motors Ltd. & Anor. v. Dr. B. O. Sangonuwa (1984) 5 SC. 184 at 186Metal Construction (West African) Uti. v. D. A. Migliore & Ors re Miss C. Ogundare (1990) ANLR 142; (1990) 1 NWLR (Pt.126) 299?


STATUTES REFERRED TO


1979 Constitution


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.