HON. OKOTO FOSTER BRUCE v. EBIKEME FRANK ERE & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

HON. OKOTO FOSTER BRUCE v. EBIKEME FRANK ERE & ORS

ALHAJI MOHAMMED SANUSI DAGGASH V HAJIA FATI IBRAHIM BULAMA & ORS
June 13, 2025
DENNIS AKOMA & ANOR v. OBI OSENWOKWU & ORS
June 13, 2025
ALHAJI MOHAMMED SANUSI DAGGASH V HAJIA FATI IBRAHIM BULAMA & ORS
June 13, 2025
DENNIS AKOMA & ANOR v. OBI OSENWOKWU & ORS
June 13, 2025
Show all

HON. OKOTO FOSTER BRUCE v. EBIKEME FRANK ERE & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (2003) Legalpedia (CA) 10115

In the Court of Appeal

HOLDEN AT PORT HARCOURT

Thu Oct 9, 2003

Suit Number: CA/PH/EPT/143/2003

CORAM


MICHAEL EYARUOMA AKPIROROH

ABOYI JOHN IKONGBEH

DAVID ADEDOYIN ADENIJI


PARTIES


HON. OKOTO FOSTER BRUCE APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Appellant as a Petitioner filed a petition before the National Assembly/Governorship and Legislative Houses Election Petition Tribunal, sitting at Yenagoa, Bayelsa State for a number of reliefs the facts or details of which were not relevant to the determination of this appeal. At the hearing of the petition, two applications were brought before the Tribunal: One of them was the Petitioner’s application wherein he objected to the appearance by the Attorney-General of Bayelsa State on behalf of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and its officials (i.e the 2nd to 22nd Respondents), which objection the Tribunal overruled. The instant appeal relates to the second ruling wherein the Tribunal struck out the Appellant’s petition, based on the objection raised by the Respondents on the ground that the petition did not comply strictly with the provisions and requirements of paragraph 4(1)(c) of the First Schedule to the Electoral Act 2002, as the Petition allegedly failed to state on the face of it, the scores of the candidates as declared by INEC. The Petitioner in a reaction to the objection insisted that by pleading in paragraph 11 of his petition that the said scores were contained in forms EC80 (1) & EC83 (1), issued by INEC, and that he would rely on the forms at the trial to show the scores, he had substantially met the requirements of the Act. The Respondents, through their counsel, however, persuaded the Tribunal to hold, which held that the pleadings in paragraph 11 did not satisfy the statutory requirements and consequently, it struck out the petition hence this appeal.


HELD


Appeal Allowed


ISSUES


? Whether pleading the form which contained the scores of the candidates in an election satisfies and or amounts to compliance with the requirement of stating the scores of the candidates in an election petition brought under the Act.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO


Decree No. 5 Of 1999Electoral Act, 2002


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.