Just Decided Cases

HARRY AKANDE V. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1976) Legalpedia (SC) 33022

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Tue Apr 20, 1976

Suit Number: SC 57/1978

CORAM


OGUNDARE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SIR UDO UDOMA, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OLABODE RHODES-VIVOUR

KAYODE ESO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ANTHONY A. ANIAGOLU, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


HARRY AKANDE APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiff sued three defendants, Service of the writ was effected on one John Maddox of the General Electric U.S.A. (Nigeria) Limited (not the 1st defendant). The 1st defendants entered conditional appearance and upon their failure to get the service of the writ set aside, filed their statement of defense and appealed against the decision of the High court.


HELD


That the order of the Federal Court of Appeal granting leave to appeal to the interveners, the General Electric Company of U.S.A. (Nigeria) Limited, and a stay of proceedings of the action, was, in all the circumstances of this case, erroneous. It was for the foregoing reasons that we set aside, with costs, the order of the said Federal Court of Appeal as hereinbefore stated.


ISSUES


Whether the granting of leave to appeal to the General Electric Company of U.S.A. Nigeria Ltd. by the Court of Appeal, in a suit which they are not parties from the order of the High Court of Lagos dated 28th September 1977 dismissing the application of the said General Electric Company of U.S.A. Nigeria Ltd., to set aside services on them of the writ of summons, in the above case is valid.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


PARTIES TO AN APPEAL


Section 121E (5) (a) of the Constitution (Amendment) (No.2), the person therein stated exercising the right of appeal to the Court of Appeal, must be one named in the record or, with leave, having “an interest” in the proceedings – which term would include a person affected or likely to be affected, or aggrieved or likely to be aggrieved by the proceedings. Per ANIAGOLU, JSC


CASES CITED


1. Re Evans v. Noton (1893) 1 Ch. 264,

2. Gillooly v. Gillooly (1950) 2 All ER 1118 at 1119

3. Maja & Ors. v. Johnson (1951) 13 WACA 194,

4. Johnson v. Aderemi (1955) 13 WACA 297 (P.C.) at 299


STATUTES REFERRED TO


1. Constitution of the Federation as amended by the Constitution (Amendment) (No.2) 1976, Decree No. 42 of 1976.

2. Federal Court of Appeal Decree 1976, No. 43 of 1976.


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

legaladmin

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

5 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

5 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

5 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

5 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

5 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

5 months ago