CORAM
ALEXANDER, CHIEF JUSTICE, NIGERIA
EMANUEL OBIOMA OGWUEGBU, JSC. JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT (Read the Leading Judgment)
SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT
mso-fareast-language:YO;}
BELLO, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT
PARTIES
GOVERNMENT OF THE MIDWEST STATE (NOW BENDEL STATE) (Trading under the name and style)
Midwest Line (now Bendel line)
ARMELS TRANSPORT LIMITED
APPELLANTS
MID-MOTORS NIGERIA COMPANY LTD
RESPONDENTS
AREA(S) OF LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE-AMENDMENT-SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES
SUMMARY OF FACTS
The respondent instituted action for breach of contract against the appellant. After close of pleadings but before judgement, he brought an application for amendment to substitute the names of the defendants for persons who were not before the court.
HELD
The court held that the substituted parties should be granted an opportunity to be heard before an order of substitution was made to make them parties in the suit.
ISSUES
Not Available
RATIONES DECIDENDI
AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS
Amendment sought can only take effect from the original date of the Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim which it amends and not on the date when the application for amendment is granted PER FATAYI-WILLIAMS JSC
MISTAKEN LEGAL IDENTITY
“To mistakenly sue a legal entity, such as the Midwest Line Ltd. instead of another legal entity such as the Government of the Midwest State (now Bendel State) as has been admittedly done in the case in hand, goes beyond a mere matter of misnomer. Because the two legal entities are, in law, separate and distinct, it seems to us that what has happened in this case is that the wrong legal entity (Midwest Line Ltd.) has been sued instead of another legal entity (The Government of Midwest State). We agree that the only way to rectify such a mistake is to substitute the correct juristic person for the one sued wrongly. Before that can be done, however, the juristic person which is being substituted must be put on notice so that it can be heard as to whether it can be properly substituted or not.” PER FATAYI-WILLIAMS JSC
CASES CITED
1. DEDHAR V. THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER OF LAND (1957) EALR 104
2. ONAYEMI V. OKUNUBI (1965)1 ALL NLR 362
STATUTES REFERRED TO
1. HIGH COURT OF LAGOS ORDINANCE CAP 80 LAWS OF THE FEDERATION 1958
2. MID-WESTERN REGION (TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS) ACT (NO 19 OF 1963)
3. NIGERIAN CONSTITUTION ORDER IN COUNCIL 1954
4. LAW REVISION (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENT) EDICT NO 3 OF 1976
5. PETITION OF RIGHT LAW (CAP 90)
6. CROWN OROCEEDING ACT 1947
7. ENGLISH RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT