Just Decided Cases

G.A. AKHIWU VS THE PRINCIPAL LOTTERIES OFFICER & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (1972) Legalpedia (SC) 41150

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Thu Mar 30, 1972

Suit Number: SC. 254/1969

CORAM


D.O. EDOZIE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MADARIKAN JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SOWEMIMO A.G. JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


G.A. AKHIWU APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Appellant/1st Defendant & 2nd Defendant both claim to be entitled to a winning ticket prize of £4000(four thousand pounds). The Plaintiff is in possession of the said money and instituted the suit to determine the owner.


HELD


The appeal was dismissed with cost. The Order of the trial court was also set aside. It was held that the trial court judge should not have ordered the arrest of the 1st defendant and ordered that he should be specifically charged with certain offences.


ISSUES


Whether the learned trial Judge erred in law and/or failed to exercise his discretion judicially in proceeding with the trial without pleadings once it became clear to him that fraud amounting to criminal offences were alleged by one side against the other

Whether the learned trial Judge erred in law in making an order for the arrest and prosecution of the appellant when the duty and responsibility for deciding on such questions are not matters within his competence


RATIONES DECIDENDI


DISCRETION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION TO DECIDE WHO AND WHAT OFFENCE SHALL BE CHARGED


” It is without question the province of the Law Officers of the Crown (in this case the Director of Public Prosecutions) to decide, in the light of what the public interest requires in any particular case, who shall be charged, and with what offence. It is entirely a matter for this officers quasi-judicial discretion and, in our view, in order to secure the proper administration of justice, he must be left to exercise this discretion according to his own judgment, neither acting on any rule of thumb nor taking into account any other consideration than the public interest.” Adopted by : Per Lewis, JSC


CASES CITED


Aerial Advertising Co. v Batchelors Peas Ltd. (Manchester), 2 All ER 788, at p. 795

Chaplin v Ricks (1911) 2 KB 786

Khanwam and Co. v Chellaram and Sons (Nig.) Ltd., (1964) 1 WLR 711 at p. 714


STATUTES REFERRED TO



CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

legaladmin

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

4 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

4 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

4 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 months ago