Just Decided Cases

FRANCIS DURWODE V THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (2000) Legalpedia (SC) 68117

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Dec 8, 2000

Suit Number: SC. 22/2000

CORAM


ADOLPHUS G. KARIBI-WHYTE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

FEDEDO FRANCIS TABAI JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

UMARU ATU KALGO , JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MITCHELL CHRISTOPHER CHUKWUMA-ENEH JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


FRANCIS DURWODE APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant was convicted sentenced of the offence of murder punishable under Section 319(1) of the Criminal Code by Odita J of Warri High Court. Per Uthman Mohammed, JSC ?


HELD


That the evidence adduced before the trial court is consistent only with the hypothesis of the guilt of the appellant.


ISSUES


Whether the trial of Appellant is not a nullity for breach of the mandatory provisions of Sec. 215 of the Criminal Procedure Law, Laws of Bendel State 1976 and Sec. 33(6) A & E of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1979 and which occasioned a miscarriage of justiceWhether the circumstantial evidence against the Appellant was positive, cogent and conclusive


RATIONES DECIDENDI


RIGHT TO INFORM THE ACCUSED PERSON OF THE OFFENCE COMMITTED


where a charge is of one count and the appellant had earlier made a statement to the police on the allegation of the crime which he has been arraigned for trial the failure of the trial judge to record that the charge has been read and explained to the accused will not amount to a miscarriage of justice once the trial court is satisfied that the accused understood the nature of charge framed against him- Per Uthman Mohammed, JSC


ADMISSIBILTY OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE


It is accepted as good law that where direct evidence of a fact in issue is not available, evidence of facts surrounding the establishment of the fact is acceptable and is very often the best evidence.- Per Adolphus Godwin Karibi-Whyte, JSC


ADMISSIBILTY OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE


A conviction on circumstantial evidence cannot be based unless and until all the inference to be drawn from the whole history of the case point strongly to the commission of the crime by the accused. -Per Uthman Mohammed, JSC


CASES CITED


1. Effiom v. The State (1995) I NWLR (Pt. 373) 5072. Lori v. State (1980) 8-11 SC 81


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Esther ORIAH

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

2 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

2 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

2 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

2 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

2 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

2 months ago