Just Decided Cases

FIRST GUARANTEE PENSION LTD V NATIONAL PENSION COMMISSION & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2015) Legalpedia (CA) 41417

In the Court of Appeal

Tue May 19, 2015

Suit Number: CA/L/16/2012

CORAM


REGINA OBIAGELI NWODO JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEAL


PARTIES


FIRST GUARANTEE PENSION LTD  APPELLANTS


1. NATIONAL PENSION COMMISSION

2. THE ATTORNEY – GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Appellant filed a motion on notice before the court praying for an order striking out the Notice of Appeal and all other court processes filed by the law firm of Babajide Koku & Co putatively on behalf of the Appellant. However, this application was contested by the said law firm of Babajide Koku & Co. Prior to the filing of this application one Chief Orlando Ojo was a director of the Appellant but due to some irregularities in the company the 1st Respondent caused an investigation to be carried out. However, before the outcome of the investigation, the said Chief Orlando Ojo and one Mr. Nze Chidi Duru resigned from the employment of the Appellant. Soon after their resignation, the 1st Respondent also removed them as directors of the Appellant. The said Chief Orlando Ojo filed processes in court without the instruction of the Appellant having ceased to be a director of the Appellant. Upon the instruction of the Appellant, this motion was filed to withdraw the processes filed by the said Chief Orlando Ojo as the Appellant has no issue or dispute with the Respondents.{C}{C}{C}.


HELD


Application Granted


ISSUES


Whether having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case the application dated 28th February 2012 ought to be granted


RATIONES DECIDENDI


COMPANY SECRETARY – A COMPANY SECRETARY CAN ACT ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANY WHEN AUTHORISED


“The company secretary can when authorized act on behalf of the company.” PER Y.B. NIMPAR, J.C.A


REPRESENTATION BY A COUNSEL – THE COURT CANNOT INTERFERE WITH THE CHOICE OF COUNSEL REPRESENTING A PARTY


“The court has no business interfering with the choice of counsel to represent a party.”PER Y.B. NIMPAR, J.C.A


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO


Company and Allied Matters Act


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

legaladmin

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

4 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

4 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

4 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 months ago