FIDELIS UBANATU V COMMISSIONER OF POLICE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

FIDELIS UBANATU V COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

ALHAJI LAWWANI ZAKARI v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE & ANOR
June 26, 2025
EFUNWAPE OKULATE & ORS VS GBADAMOSI AWOSANYA & ORS
June 26, 2025
ALHAJI LAWWANI ZAKARI v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE & ANOR
June 26, 2025
EFUNWAPE OKULATE & ORS VS GBADAMOSI AWOSANYA & ORS
June 26, 2025
Show all

FIDELIS UBANATU V COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (2000) Legalpedia (SC) 50748

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Mon Jan 24, 2000

Suit Number: SC. 69/1999

CORAM


S.O. UWAIFO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

E.O. AYOOLA JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


FIDELIS UBANATU APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant was arraigned on a two count charge in the Warri Magistrate’s Court, Delta State for threatening to kill which is section 323 Of the Criminal Code, Cap, 48, Vol. 11, Laws of defunct Bendel State of Nigeria, 1976 as applicable in Delta State.


HELD


That a no case submission was ought to have been upheld by the courts below and the accused was discharged and acquitted


ISSUES


1. Whether the essential ingredients of the offence contained in Section 323 of the Criminal Code applicable in Delta State were exhaustively enunciated by the Court of Appeal.2. Whether the ingredients of actus reus and mens rea are not embedded in Section 323 of the Criminal Code applicable in Delta State or in other words, whether section 323 of the Criminal Code under consideration was one of strict liability.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


MEANING OF “PRIMA FACIE”


On the face of it, “suggests that the evidence produced so far indicates that there is something worth looking at. – Per Emanuel Obioma Ogwuegbu, JSC


WHEN A NO CASE SUBMISSION CAN BE MADE


The circumstances where a no case to answer can properly be made and upheld are as follows:
(a) When there has been no evidence in the alleged offence;
(b) when the evidence adduced by the prosecution has been so discredited as a result of cross examination or is so manifestly unreliable that no reasonable tribunal could safely convict on it- Per Emanuel Obioma Ogwuegbu, JSC
The prosecution could not be said to have made out a prima facie case requiring any explanation from the appellant.- Per Emanuel Obioma Ogwuegbu, JSC


CASES CITED


1. Ibeziako v Commissioner of Police (1963) 1 All N.LR612. Atano v Attorney-General, Bendel State (1988) 2 NWLR. (Pt.75) 2013. Ajidagba & 4 Ors. v  Inspector General of Police (1958) 3 FSC.5 4. Ikomi v. The State (1986)3 N.W.L.R.(Pt. 28)340 at 366


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.