FEDERAL COMMISSIONER FOR WORKS AND HOUSING V LABABEDI & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

FEDERAL COMMISSIONER FOR WORKS AND HOUSING V LABABEDI & ORS

MUSILIU I. BASHUA V. DR. OLADIPO MAJA
August 6, 2025
CHIEF J.K. ODUMOSU V. AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD
August 6, 2025
MUSILIU I. BASHUA V. DR. OLADIPO MAJA
August 6, 2025
CHIEF J.K. ODUMOSU V. AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD
August 6, 2025
Show all

FEDERAL COMMISSIONER FOR WORKS AND HOUSING V LABABEDI & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1976-11) Legalpedia (SC) 09141

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Thu Nov 25, 1976

Suit Number: SC. 138/1976

CORAM


EMANUEL OBIOMA OGWUEGBU, JSC. JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT (Read the Leading Judgment)

OKAY ACHIKE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OBASEKI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


FEDERAL COMMISSIONER FOR WORKS AND HOUSING

APPELLANTS 


LABABEDI & ORS

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


LAND LAW-PROOF OF TITLE TO LAND

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant laid claim to a parcel, his claim was supported by the historical title traced to his predecessor, the documentary evidence and acts of ownership. The respondent also laid claim to the same parcel of land

 


HELD


The court held that the respondents claim failed because his evidence was not sufficient to prove his claim and title to the land in dispute judgement ought to be given for the appellant.

 


ISSUES


Not Available

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


APPEAL ON FINDINGS OF FACTS – DUTY OF THE APPELLATE COURT


“In appeals on findings of fact, the attitude of the Court of Appeal is one of caution and of reluctance in interfering with facts found by the trial courts. But where there is an obvious error in appraisal of oral evidence and ascription of probative values to such evidence, or where an improper or imperfect use has been made of the opportunity of seeing and hearing the witnesses or where wrong conclusions have been drawn from accepted or proved facts or where the learned trial judge has approached the determination of those facts in a manner which those facts cannot and do not in themselves support, the Court of Appeal in those circumstances is entitled to and indeed has a duty to interfere and set aside the findings. PER OBASEKI JSC

 


CASES CITED


1. AKINOLA &ORS V. FAGBOYINBO OLUWO & ORS (1962) ALL NLR 264

2. FASHANU V. ADEKOYE (1974) 1 ALL NLR (PT 1) 41

3. OGBERO EGRI V. EDEDHO UPERI (1974) VOL 1 NMLR 22

4. CHIEF SHOGBON FABUMUYI &ANOR V.FATUMO OBAJE &ANOR (1961) NMLR 242

5. BENMAX V. AUSTIN MOTORS CO. LTD (1955) AC 370

6. LAWAL BRAIMOH FATOYINBO & ORS V. SELIATU ABIKE WILLIAMS (1965)1 FSC 67

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Not Available

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.