FAMFA OIL LIMITED V ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

FAMFA OIL LIMITED V ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION

CHIMA ANOZIE V DR. KEN OBICHERE & ORS
June 13, 2025
DR. CHINEDU IWU V GREGORY NWUGO & ORS
June 13, 2025
CHIMA ANOZIE V DR. KEN OBICHERE & ORS
June 13, 2025
DR. CHINEDU IWU V GREGORY NWUGO & ORS
June 13, 2025
Show all

FAMFA OIL LIMITED V ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION

Legalpedia Citation: (2003) Legalpedia (SC) 06006

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Oct 17, 2003

Suit Number: SC.305/2002

CORAM


SALIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

UWANI MUSA ABBA AJI

AKINTOLA OLUFEMI EJIWUMI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

AUGUSTINE NNAMANI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


FAMFA OIL LIMITED APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant was plaintiff at the trial Federal High Court, Abuja Division. It took out an originating summons ostensibly under Order 7 rule 8 of the Federal High Court Rules 2000. Due to an unexplained reason the originating summons sent to the defendants (now respondents) was not signed by the judge, rather, a registrar of the Court by name Ojo, signed the summons.


HELD


 Appeal allowed


ISSUES


“(i) Whether or not the fact that it was the Registrar and not the Judge who signed the Originating Summons constitutes an incurable irregularity which invalidates the said Summons or render it a nullity.(ii) In considering the correct answer to Question (i), whether or not it is material whose lapse led to the ‘irregularity’ in the said Summons.”


RATIONES DECIDENDI


NATURE OF ORIGINATING SUMMONS


The very nature of an originating summons is to make things simpler for hearing. It is available to any person claiming interest under a deed, will or other written instrument whereby he will apply by originating summons for the determination of any question of construction arising under the instrument for a declaration of his interest. Per S.M.A Belgore J.S.C.


CASES CITED


Doherty V. Doherty (1968) NMLR 241Alhaji Dahiru Saude V. Alhaji Hakim Abdullahi (1989) 3 NSCC (Vol. 20) 177, 178.Bello V. Attorney General of Oyo State (1986) 6 N.W.L.R. (Part 45) 828.Consortioum M. C. V. N.E.P.A. (1992) 6 N.W.L.R. (Part 246) 132 at 142.Doherty V. Doherty (1968) NMLR 241.Falobi V. Falobi (1976) 1 N.M.L.R. 169Finnegan V. Cementation Co. Ltd. (1953) 1 Q.B. 688 at 699.Ojukwu vs. Onyeador (1991) 7 NWLR (pt. 203) 286, 30, 321.Okonjo V. Dr. Odje (1985) 10 S.C. 267.Okoye V. Nigerian Construction Co. Ltd. & Ors (1991) 6 N.W.L.R. (Pt.199) at 539.Onifade vs. Orayiwola (1990) & NNLR (pt. 161) 130, 1669.Saude V. Abdullahi (1989) 3 N.S.C.C. 177 at 187.Sken Consult (Nig.) Ltd. vs. Ukey (1981) 1 SC. 6, 2.Western Steel Workers Union vs. Iron and Steel Workers Union (1986) 3 NWLR (pt.30) 617, 627D.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


 The Federal High Court Rules 2000


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.