FAGBEMI AKANO V. MOSES ALABI OKUNADE & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

FAGBEMI AKANO V. MOSES ALABI OKUNADE & ORS

ABIGAIL MOJIBOLA MAJEKODUNMI & ANOR. V. NATIONAL BANK OF NIGERIA LTD
August 4, 2025
LAGOS CITY COUNCIL CARETAKER COMMITTEE & ANOR V. BENJAMIN UNACHUKWU & ANOR
August 4, 2025
ABIGAIL MOJIBOLA MAJEKODUNMI & ANOR. V. NATIONAL BANK OF NIGERIA LTD
August 4, 2025
LAGOS CITY COUNCIL CARETAKER COMMITTEE & ANOR V. BENJAMIN UNACHUKWU & ANOR
August 4, 2025
Show all

FAGBEMI AKANO V. MOSES ALABI OKUNADE & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1978-03) Legalpedia (SC) 31147

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Mar 31, 1978

Suit Number: SC. 90/1976

CORAM


OGUNDARE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ANIAGOLU JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ANTHONY N. ANIAGOLU, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


FAGBEMI AKANO

APPELLANTS 


MOSES ALABI OKUNADE

AMUSA POPOOLALAWAL

JINADU OJO APITIPITI

YEKINNI ADEBESIN

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


POSSESSION – INHERITANCE

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant was granted the land in dispute and later dispossessed when he travelled out of town. He instituted action for title and possession. The trial court refused the claim for title on the ground that absolute grant was not proved but granted possession and mesne profit which was set aside by the court of appeal.

 


HELD


The court allowed the appeal.

 


ISSUES


In a claim for recovery of possession of farmland containing permanent crops – cocoa, kolanuts, awusa, orange and native wrapping leaves, on grounds of unlawful ejectment of plaintiffs caretaker while plaintiff was out of the country, does the evidence of the rule of inheritance under customary law that a senior brother does not inherit the property of the junior brother dis-entitle the plaintiff who was in possession of the farmland before ejectment from succeeding in the action when the only evidence of the late junior brothers interest was that his farm is included in the farm in dispute

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


INCIDENTS OF POSSESSION


possession in itself is a good title as against everyone except the true owner and if one who has been in possession is wrongly dispossessed, he is entitled to recover possession against the wrongdoer notwithstanding that the true title may be shown to be in a third person stealing -Obaseki J.S.C.

 


WHEN THE CUSTOMARY LAW RULE THAT A SENIOR BROTHER DOES NOT INHERIT THE PROPERTY OF A JUNIOR BROTHER APPLIES


In a claim for recovery of possession of farmland the evidence of the rule of inheritance under customary law that a senior brother does not inherit the property of the junior brother does not disentitle the plaintiff who was in possession of the farmland before ejectment from succeeding in the action when the only evidence of the late junior brothers interest was that his farm is included in the farm in dispute- Obaseki J.S.C

 


CASES CITED


Bramwell v. Bramwell (1942) 1 KB 370

Nwosu v. Otunola (1974) 1 All NLR pt. 1 page 533

Asher v. Whitlock (1865) LR. 1 QB 1

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Not Available

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.