Just Decided Cases

EUGENE NNAEKWE EGESIMBA V. EZEKIEL ONUZURUIKE

Legalpedia Citation: (2002) Legalpedia (SC) 41164

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Sep 20, 2002

Suit Number: SC. 118/1998

CORAM


MICHAEL EKUNDAYO OGUNDARE, CHIEF JUSTICE, NIGERIA

EMMANUEL OLAYINKA AYOOLA, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


EUGENE NNAEKWE EGESIMBA APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiff and the defendant both claimed title to the land in dispute in respect of which there had been a customary arbitration which ended in favour of the defendant.


HELD


The court held (Tobi J.S.C dissenting) that the Customary Arbitration which ended in favour of the defendant created estoppel against the plaintiff.   ?


ISSUES


[1] Whether failure by the appellants to file a Reply to the Statement of Defence amounted to an admission of a grant or relieved the respondent of his duty to prove a grant of the land.[2] Whether the respondent proved a binding customary arbitration in his favour as against the appellant’s assertion that there was no customary arbitration.[3] Whether the appellant proved the value of the Iroko tree felled and sawed by the respondent.?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


EFFECT OF CONTRADICTIONS IN TESTIMONY


Not all contradictions result in the rejection of the evidence of a witness but only those that are material and result in a miscarriage of justice -Ogundare J.S.C


INGREDIENTS OF CUSTOMARY ARBITRATION


(i) voluntary submission of the dispute to the arbitration of the individual or body;
(ii) agreement by the parties either expressly or by implication that the decision of the be accepted and binding;
(iii) that the arbitration was in accordance with the custom of the parties and
(iv) that the arbitrators reached a decision and published their award. – Ayoola J.S.C


EFFECT OF CUSTOMARY ARBITRATION


Customary arbitration by elders of the community is one of many African customary modes of settling disputes and once it satisfied the necessary requirements indicated above as in the case, its decision shall have a binding effect, and has the same authority as the judgment of a judicial body having binding effect on the parties and thus create an estoppel – Ayoola J.S.C


CASES CITED


Ohiaeri v. Akabeze [1992] 23 NSCC (pt. 1) 139 Agu v. Ikwewibe [1991] 22 NSCC (pt. 1) 385Igah & Ors. v. Chief Ezekiel Amakiri (1976) 11 SC1 Egbuna v. Egbuna (1989) 2 NWLR (Pt. 106) 733Agu v. Ikewibe [1991] 1 NSCC 385, 400.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Esther ORIAH

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

2 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

2 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

2 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

2 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

2 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

2 months ago