ESTATE OF ALHAJI N.B. SOULE V. OLUSEYE JOHNSON & COMPANY & ANOR - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ESTATE OF ALHAJI N.B. SOULE V. OLUSEYE JOHNSON & COMPANY & ANOR

JACKSON I SANYA V. M. A. O. JOHNSON
August 11, 2025
CHIEF DAVID ONOTSUORAN EREKU & ORS V. MILITARY GOVERNOR, MID-WESTERN STATE OF NIGERIA & ORS
August 11, 2025
JACKSON I SANYA V. M. A. O. JOHNSON
August 11, 2025
CHIEF DAVID ONOTSUORAN EREKU & ORS V. MILITARY GOVERNOR, MID-WESTERN STATE OF NIGERIA & ORS
August 11, 2025
Show all

ESTATE OF ALHAJI N.B. SOULE V. OLUSEYE JOHNSON & COMPANY & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (1974-11) Legalpedia (SC) 19013

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Nov 1, 1974

Suit Number: SC. 216/1974

CORAM


MUHAMMED BELLO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ALEXANDER JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


THE ESTATE OF ALHAJI N.B. SOULE (deceased) by the Administrator and Administratrices

APPELLANTS 


OLUSEYE JOHNSON & COMPANY (Provisional Liquidators )…ST OBJECTOR of the Muslim Bank (W.A.) Ltd. )

THE ESTATE OF THE LATE WILLIAM ADEDOYIN II, (the Akarigbo of Ijebu Remo)..

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


LANDLAW- EQUITABLE INTEREST IN LAND

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellants are administrators to the estate of the deceased. The deceased bought the equitable interest in a parcel of land, which land the deceased gave to the Muslim Bank (who has the defendant as Liquidators) for shares in the bank. On Liquidation of the bank, the appellant sought to register as owners of the land and was so granted after investigation based on objections raised by the defendant.

 


HELD


The Supreme Court that it would have been most unfair to the bank to have allowed the appellants to keep both the shares which they still have in the bank and disputed premises which their father gave in exchange for those shares and the appeal therefore fails and the decision of the lower court was upheld.

 


ISSUES


Whether the appellant (who have now stepped into the shoes of the late Alhaji Soule who, before his death, had sold whatever interest he had in the property to the Muslim Bank), pursuant to Section 6 (a) of the Act, are “entitled in equity to an estate in fee simple” in the said property and can therefore apply to be registered as owner of the fee simple of that property

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


WHEN EQUITY WILL AID A PERSON


“a person is entitled in equity to an estate in fee simple in any land which can be registered under the act if he can show that, having regard to the surrounding circumstances, he is justly or in all fairness, so entitled.” Per T.O. ELIAS, JSC

 


CASES CITED


Winter Garden Theatre (London) v. Millenium Productions (1948) A.C 173 at pg 203

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Registration of Titles Act Cap 181 of the Laws of the Federation

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.