DR. SAMUEL U. ISITOR vs. MRS. MARGARET FAKORADE
April 15, 2025GUARANTY TRUST BANK PLC V INNOSON NIGERIA LIMITED
April 15, 2025Legalpedia Citation: (2017) Legalpedia (SC) 21291
In the Supreme Court of Nigeria
Fri May 12, 2017
Suit Number: SC.242/2013
CORAM
MUSA DATIJO MUHAMMAD
PARTIES
EMEKA OKO APPELLANTS
RESPONDENTS
AREA(S) OF LAW
SUMMARY OF FACTS
The Appellant was charge before the High Court of Enugu state on a one count charge of murder contrary to section 274 (1) of the Criminal Code Laws of Anambra State of Nigeria, 1986 applicable to Enugu State wherein he was alleged to have murdered one Ikenna Friday Mbah at the Estate Shopping Centre, Federal Housing Estate, Trans Ekulu, Enugu as a result of a quarrel that ensued between them. At the trial the Appellant pleaded not guilty to the charge. He however admitted inflicting the matchet cut that led to the death of the deceased in his extra judicial statement and his testimony before the court. At the conclusion of the trial, the court considered whether the defences of self defence or provocation availed him. The court ruled out self-defence but held that the defence of provocation was established. He was found not guilty of murder but convicted for the lesser offence of manslaughter and sentenced to 15 years imprisonment with hard labour. Dissatisfied with the trial court’s decision, the prosecution appealed to the Court of Appeal which allowed the appeal and set aside the judgement of the trial court. Aggrieved with the lower court’s decision, on his conviction and sentence to death, the Appellant has lodged an appeal before this court.
HELD
Appeal Allowed
ISSUES
? Whether the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal were right when they held that since the defence of self-defence could not avail the appellant on the facts and evidence, the same facts and evidence could not ground a defence of provocation.? Whether the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal were right when in the face of the evidence before the court, they held that the defence of provocation was not proved and did not avail the appellant.? Whether the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal were right when they recorded and pronounced a sentence of death by hanging on the appellant
RATIONES DECIDENDI
CASES CITED
STATUTES REFERRED TO
Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999Criminal Code Laws of Anambra State of Nigeria, 1986 applicable to Enugu State