Just Decided Cases

E.K. ISERU VS CATHOLIC BISHOP OF WARRI DIOCESS

Legalpedia Citation: (1997) Legalpedia (SC) 06378

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

HOLDEN AT ABUJA

Thu Apr 3, 1997

Suit Number: SC.25/1993

CORAM


A.B. WALI

OLAJIDE OLATAWURA., JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

U. MOHAMMED

A.I. IGUH


PARTIES


E. K. ISERU (Substituted by Doris Iseru) APPELLANTS


CATHOLIC BISHOP OF WARRI DIOCESS RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

SUMMARY OF FACTS
The respondent is the sole trustee and custodian of all the properties belonging to the Catholic Mission within the Warri Catholic Diocess. The land in dispute forms a portion of a parcel of land owned and possessed by the respondent either through a grant or by possessory right.


HELD


In the result, this appeal has failed. The judgment of the Court of Appeal in which it affirmed the decision of the trial High Court is hereby affirmed by me. The appeal is dismissed. I award N1000.00 costs in favour of the respondent.


ISSUES


1. Whether the appellant could be adjudged a trespasser when the respondent was not in exclusive possession of the land allegedly trespassed upon by the appellant 2. Whether the respondent could succeed in his claim against the appellant based on trespass to the land in dispute when the Mission was not in exclusive possession of the land in dispute.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CONCURRENT FINDINGS OF FACT BY TWO LOWER COURTS


The rule of practice is that, in the absence of special circumstances, this court will not allow a question of fact to be re-opened where there have been two concurrent findings of fact by two lower courts.


TRESPASSER CAN MAINTAIN ACTION IN TRESSPASS


In a claim for trespass to land once the plaintiff is shown to be in possession, the defendant, in order to defeat plaintiff’s claim must show better title to the land. This is so since a trespasser or squatter can maintain an action in trespass against the whole world except the true owner or the one with a better title.


CASES CITED


Amakor v. Obiefuna (1974) 1 All NLR 119.Mogo Chinwendu v. Nwanegbo Mbamali (1980) 3 SC 31 Ukpe lbodo & Ors. v. Enarofia and Ors (1980) 5-7 SC 42 at 55.Akin Adejumo and 2 others v. Ajani Yusuf Ayantegbe (1989)All NLR. 468; (1989) 3 NWLR (Pt.110) 417.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Not Available.|


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

legaladmin

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

4 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

4 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

4 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 months ago