DR. EDOZIEN VS E.A. AMADI - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

DR. EDOZIEN VS E.A. AMADI

DABIRI AND ORS VS CHIEF A. B. GBAJUMO
September 8, 2025
OLAWOYIN J. S. VS COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
September 8, 2025
DABIRI AND ORS VS CHIEF A. B. GBAJUMO
September 8, 2025
OLAWOYIN J. S. VS COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
September 8, 2025
Show all

DR. EDOZIEN VS E.A. AMADI

Legalpedia Citation: (1961-09) Legalpedia 98755 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Lagos

Sun Apr 9, 1961

Suit Number: SC. 91/1961

CORAM


ADEMOLA, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

UNSWORTH , JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

BAIRAMIAN, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


APPELLANTS


E. A. AMADI

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATE LAW – EXECUTOR DE-SON-TORT -EVIDENCE

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

The appellant was alleged to have intermeddled with deceased property in respect of which the respondent brought a claim. No evidence was led as to the nature or the value of the properties.

 


HELD


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

The court held that there was no sufficient evidence upon which the appellant was found to be an executor de-son-tort and that the matter should be retried before a magistrate.

 


ISSUES


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

Whether the lower courts were right in finding that the appellant was executor de-son-tort liable to the sum claimed by the respondent

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION 1960 FSC 207/1959 [1960] NSCC 41


1. MEANING OF EXECUTOR DE-SON

‘An executor de son tort is one who intermeddles with the estate of a deceased person. The slightest circumstance may make a person executor de son tort if he intermeddles with the assets in such a way as to denote an assumption of the authority or an intention to exercise the functions of an executor.’ Per Ademola C.J.F

2. LIABILITY OF AN EXECUTOR DE- SON

‘An executor de son tort is not liable for more than that portion of the deceased’s property which has come to his hands.’ Per Ademola C.J.F

 


CASES CITED


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

Peter v. Leader (1878) 47 L.J.Q.13. 573

Lowry v. Fulton (1839) 9 Sim. 115;

Yardley v. Arnold (1842) Car. & M. 434

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Not Available

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.