DR. CHRIS A. TAMUNO & ORS V PROFESSOR EDWARD E. EZEWU - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

DR. CHRIS A. TAMUNO & ORS V PROFESSOR EDWARD E. EZEWU

HON. OKOTO FOSTER BRUCE V MR. EBIKEME FRANK ERE & ORS
June 10, 2025
LEADWAY ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD V JOMBO UNITED COMPANY LTD
June 11, 2025
HON. OKOTO FOSTER BRUCE V MR. EBIKEME FRANK ERE & ORS
June 10, 2025
LEADWAY ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD V JOMBO UNITED COMPANY LTD
June 11, 2025
Show all

DR. CHRIS A. TAMUNO & ORS V PROFESSOR EDWARD E. EZEWU

Legalpedia Citation: (2004) Legalpedia (CA) 11423

In the Court of Appeal

HOLDEN AT PORT HARCOURT

Thu Nov 25, 2004

Suit Number: CA/PH/162/2002

CORAM


NNAMANI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

PIUS OLAYIWOLA ADEREMI, JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEAL

BODE RHODES- VIVOUR


PARTIES


DR. CHRIS A. TAMUNO2. UNIVERSITY OF PORT HARCOURT APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Plaintiff instituted an action against the Defendants at the Federal High Court sitting at Port Harcourt over alleged termination of his appointment, and an order of injunction restraining the Defendants from giving effect to the purported letter of termination of the Plaintiff’s appointment with special and general damages. Mid-way into the hearing the Defendants filed an application to the Court seeking that the name of the 1st Defendant be struck out of the proceeding on grounds of not being a proper party to the proceeding. In his ruling, the learned Federal High Court Judge refused to strike out the name of the 1st Defendant from the proceeding. Not satisfied the Defendants now Appellants appealed against the ruling to the Court of Appeal.


HELD


Appeal Dismissed


ISSUES


Whether the 1st defendant was not a proper party to the suit.Whether the suit is incompetent and therefore the court below lacks jurisdiction to entertain it and ought to have discharged the order of interim injunction made on 25/06/2001 in the suit.”


RATIONES DECIDENDI


JURISDICTION OF A COURT – DETERMINATION OF THE JURISDICTION OF A COURT


“It is settled law that the jurisdiction of a court of law is determined by the claim before the court, as prescribed by the plaintiff”. PER OMAGE JCA


INTERIM INJUNCTION- PURPOSE FOR ISSUING AN ORDER OF INTERIM INJUNCTION


“It’s trite that an order for an interim injunction is issued in order to preserve the res, subject matter of litigation pending the determination of the issues in conflict in court. It is true that damages of undertaking may be imposed in lieu of making the order. PER OMAGE JCA


CASES CITED


A.G. Anambra State v. A.G. Federation (1993) 4 NWLR (Pt 117) 57.Kotoye v. CON (1989) 1 NWLR p. 419.Savannah Bank Ltd v. Pan Atlantic (1987) 1 NWLR (Pt 49) 212;


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.