DANIEL ASIYANBI AND ORS VS EMMANUEL AWE ADENIJI
August 29, 2025SONUGA J.S. AND ORS VS CHIEF KEHINDE ANADEIN AND ORS
August 29, 2025Legalpedia Citation: (1967-03) Legalpedia 71656 (SC)
In the Supreme Court of Nigeria
Holden at Abuja
Fri Mar 10, 1967
Suit Number: SC 378/1965
CORAM
ADEMOLA CHIEF JUSTICE, NIGERIA
COKER JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT
LEWIS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT
PARTIES
Z.O. DEMUREN
APPELLANTS
ASHIMI ASUNI & S. SOGUNRO
RESPONDENTS
AREA(S) OF LAW
APPEAL- COURT- EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE GROUNDS OF APPEAL- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – APPLICATION OF ENGLISH RULES
SUMMARY OF FACTS
The appellant’s appeal to the high court from a customary court was dismissed on the ground that the court had no power to grant extension of time within which to file memorandum of grounds of appeal under the customary court rules.
HELD
The court held that the high court had jurisdiction to extend time under the High Court rules which provides that where the rules are silent on a matter, recourse should be had to the practice and procedure in England.
ISSUES
Whether the High Court had the power to extend time within which an appellant may file memorandum of his grounds of appeal in view of the fact that the rules are silent and gives no express powers to the court to do so.
RATIONES DECIDENDI
POWER OF COURT TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE GROUND OF APPEAL
‘by virtue of the power conferred by rule 5 order 3 of the Rules of the Supreme Court in England the High Court had power to extend the time to file grounds of appeal . … it is convenient to do so and is not inconsistent with the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, to the Customary Courts Rules as to the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules.’ Per Lewis J.S.C
CASES CITED
1. Schafer v. Blyth (1920) 3K.B.140 at 143
2. Ofem Odey v. Ovat Edim of Akam 6 W.A.C.A.63
3. Ratnena v. Cumarasamy 1964 All.E.R.933
STATUTES REFERRED TO
1. The High Court Law of Western Nigeria (Cap. 44)
2. High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules

