DE FACTO BAKERIES & CATERING LTD VS MRS A. AJILORE & ANOR - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

DE FACTO BAKERIES & CATERING LTD VS MRS A. AJILORE & ANOR

TAIWO BUCNOR SMART V. THE STATE
August 9, 2025
MUSHUD O. BADA V. MRS. H. F. PEREIRA & ORS
August 9, 2025
TAIWO BUCNOR SMART V. THE STATE
August 9, 2025
MUSHUD O. BADA V. MRS. H. F. PEREIRA & ORS
August 9, 2025
Show all

DE FACTO BAKERIES & CATERING LTD VS MRS A. AJILORE & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (1974-11) Legalpedia 90336 (CA)

In the Court of Appeal

Holden At Lagos

Thu Nov 28, 1974

Suit Number: SC 297/1973

CORAM


COKER, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

WILLIAMS, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

IBEKWE, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


DE FACTO BAKERIES & CATERING LTD

APPELLANTS 


MRS. A. AJILORE & ANOR

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


LAND LAW-LEASE-TRESPASS

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Appellant/Plaintiff and Respondent/1st defendant are both lessees to different piece of lands numbered 16 and 17 accordingly. The Plaintiff violated their building plan and trespassed on the 1st defendant land. The Plaintiff & 1st defendant tried to come to an agreement and negotiate that the 1st defendant draw another building plan that will accommodate the plaintiffs trespass but there was a fall out of negotiations. The defendant then erected a building in accordance with the original building plan, hence obstructing the Plaintiffs window, doors and other outlets.

 


HELD


It was held that the appeal failed and it was dismissed with costs because there was no grant issued for an easement and the Adoptive bye laws was inconsistent with the Shomolu -Ilupeju Scheme (Approval) Order, so does not apply to the Shomolu- ilupeju Layout.

 


ISSUES


(1) Whether the plaintiffs were entitled to an easement over the adjoining plot No S.17 which the defendants could not disregard

(2)Whether the buildings of the 1st defendant, pursuant to her amended plan Exhibit R, were in contravention of Section 8 of the building Adoptive Bye-Laws Order 1960 (W.R.L.N. 171 of 1960), and so there should issue a mandatory injunction ordering her to pull down such buildings

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


MEANING OF EASEMENT


Easement is a jus in re aliena, i.e. a right enjoyed over the property of another person and must be created by a grant (express, implied or presumed) or by statute. It is not by itself an incorporeal hereditament in the sense that it is capable like other forms of personal property of being purchased or sold by anybody: it is rather a right appurtenant to a corporeal hereditament, a right which is enjoyed as part of a real property. – Per G.B.A Coker, JSC

 


CASES CITED


Not Available

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Section 10 of the Shomolu-Ilupeju Scheme (Approval) Order 1961 (W.N.L.R. No.60 of 1961)

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.