DABO FULANI AND ANOR VS BORNU N.A. - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

DABO FULANI AND ANOR VS BORNU N.A.

ISAAC J. A. BORO AND ORS VS THE REPUBLIC
September 1, 2025
MARION OBIMONURE VS OJUMOOLA ERINOSHO AND ANOR
September 1, 2025
ISAAC J. A. BORO AND ORS VS THE REPUBLIC
September 1, 2025
MARION OBIMONURE VS OJUMOOLA ERINOSHO AND ANOR
September 1, 2025
Show all

DABO FULANI AND ANOR VS BORNU N.A.

Legalpedia Citation: (1966-11) Legalpedia 25140 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Abuja

Fri Nov 25, 1966

Suit Number: SC 460/1966

CORAM


BRETT JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

AJEGBO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

LEWIS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


DABO FULANI AND ANOR

APPELLANTS 


 BORNU N.A.

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


CULPABLE HOMICIDE

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellants were tried in the Court of the Shehu of Bomu and convicted of culpable homicide punishable with death, the offence being described as one contrary to section 221 (a) of the Penal Code. They appealed to the High Court in which their appeal was dismissed. Not satisfied with the decision of the high court, they further appealed to the Supreme Court.

 

 


HELD


The convictions under section 221 of the Penal Code and the sentences of death were set aside. Instead, the appellants were convicted of culpable homicide not punishable with death and judgment would be passed at a later date. The appellants were to remain in prison until sentence is passed.

 

 


ISSUES


Whether the High Court was right to dismiss their appeal, but substituted a conviction under section 221 (b) of the Code.

 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CONVICTION OF CULPABLE HOMICIDE PUNISHABLE WITH DEATH


“In the High Court it would not be permissible to convict of culpable homicide punishable with death on a charge worded as the charge in the present case was, and although section 387 of the Criminal Procedure Code makes a formal charge unnecessary in a native court it is not to be used as justifying a charge which is capable of misleading an accused person as to the ingredients of the offence alleged against him.”

 


CASES CITED


Not Available

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Not Available

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.