CHIEF TIJANI JEGEDE & ORS V. ABA BAKARE GBAJUMO & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

CHIEF TIJANI JEGEDE & ORS V. ABA BAKARE GBAJUMO & ORS

YETUNDE ONI & ORS V. L.C.C. CARETAKER COMMITTEE & ORS
August 11, 2025
SALAWU YOYE V. LAWANI OLUBODE & ORS
August 11, 2025
YETUNDE ONI & ORS V. L.C.C. CARETAKER COMMITTEE & ORS
August 11, 2025
SALAWU YOYE V. LAWANI OLUBODE & ORS
August 11, 2025
Show all

CHIEF TIJANI JEGEDE & ORS V. ABA BAKARE GBAJUMO & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1974-10) Legalpedia (SC) 10615

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Oct 25, 1974

Suit Number: SC. 343/1973

CORAM


TASLIM O. ELIAS, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

GEORGE S. SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

DANIEL O. IBEKWE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


CHIEF TIJANI JEGEDE & ORS

APPELLANTS 


ABA BAKARE GBAJUMO & ORS

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


LAND LAW – DECLARATION OF TITLE TO LAND – POSSESSION UNDER CUSTOMARY LAW -TRESPASS /PLEADINGS

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The respondent claimed possession of the land in dispute and sought injunction against the appellant from further trespass. Both parties pleaded traditional history as the root of their title to the land. The lower court found that the appellant was not liable in trespass but granted possession to the respondent.

 


HELD


The court held that the question of ownership of the land was raised by the pleadings of the parties and that the lower court ought to have resolved the issue of title and that possession no matter how long does not confer title under customary law.

 


ISSUES


Whether from the facts and circumstances of this case the lower court ought to have resolved the issue of title to the land in dispute.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CONFLICTING AVERMENTS REGARDING POSSESSION OF LAND


When conflicting averments are made by opposing parties in their pleadings regarding possession of land, it is the duty of the court to decide the issues as to which party has the title or superior title. Per Sowemimo J.S.C

 


CASES CITED


Not Available

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Not Available

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.