Just Decided Cases

CHIEF (PRINCE) R.A. OLUSI VS ALHAJI SAIDI SAIDI

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (CA) 17141

In the Court of Appeal

Tue Jun 14, 2016

Suit Number: CA/L/272/2014

CORAM



PARTIES


CHIEF (PRINCE) R.A. OLUSI? APPELLANTS


ALHAJI SAIDI SAIDI MADAM LATIFAT TIJANIMR KOLAWOLE ADESEGBA (For themselves and on behalf of all the beneficiaries of late Seidu Adelakun)? RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Claimant/Respondent instituted an action in a representative capacity at the Ikeja Judicial Division of the High Court of Lagos State seeking a declaration that the Claimants are the bona-fide owners of the property now municipally described as No. 3 Idiomo Street/No. 4, Egbe Street, Isale-Eko in the Lagos State of Nigeria by virtue of the Deed of Conveyance dated the 3rd day of June, 1998 registered as No. 7 at page 13 in Volume 33 in the Register of Deeds kept in the Lagos State Lands Registry, an order of perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant whether by himself, servants, agents or privies from meddling or interfering with the said property and the sum of N500,000.00(Five Hundred Thousand Naira) being general damages for acts of trespass committed on the property.  At the close of trial, judgment was entered in favour of the Respondents. Dissatisfied with the said judgement, the Appellant has filed the instant appeal before this court.


HELD


Appeal Allowed


ISSUES


?    Whether the Learned trial Judge was correct in holding that the Respondents have traced their root of title to the purchase made by their grandfather and that they have gone further to trace and establish the title of their grandfather’s vendor?    Whether the Learned trial Judge was correct in holding the identity of the land in dispute was admitted by the Appellant.?    Whether the Learned trial Judge was correct on the true position of the application of the doctrine of Estoppel per rem judicatam as regards the decision of the Registrar of titles Exhibit “11”?    Whether the Learned trial Judge was correct in holding that the Respondents have established a better title to the subject property and are thus entitled to the judgment of the Court.”


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO


Administration of Estates Law Cap. A3 Laws of Lagos State (2003)Evidence Act, 2011


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

legaladmin

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

5 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

5 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

5 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

5 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

5 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

5 months ago