Just Decided Cases

CHIEF OMONIYI FAYEHUN & ORS VS CHIEF R.A. FADOJU & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (2000) Legalpedia (SC) 21671

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Apr 7, 2000

Suit Number: SC. 75/1994

CORAM


A.G. KARIBI-WHYTE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

M.E. OGUNDARE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

S.O. UWAIFO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

E.O. AYOOLA JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


CHIEF OMONIYI FAYEHUN ABRAHAM AJAYI NOFIU AJANGBARA EZEKIEL OLUYIDE OLU BELLOADELEYE ORUNKOYI DABOKU OLASEINDE MOBISOLA FASULERE OLADAPO AWODEY APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant sought to challenge the sale of plots of land belonging to the family by the 1st defendant who is the head of the family acting in concurrence with some other members of the family. ?


HELD


The court held that the appellants having admitted that the 1st defendant was the head of the family and he sold with the concurrence of other principal members, the sale can not be voided. ?


ISSUES


1. Whether in the absence of legal and credible evidence in proof of the requirements by law for a valid disposition of family land under the Yoruba Customary Law, the Court of Appeal can still proceed to confirm the judgment of the lower court which declared as valid the sales made by the 1st – 4th respondents to the 5th – 75th respondents in violation of such principles of law.2. Whether upon the failure of the 1st – 4th respondents to prove their capacity Authority to represent or power of attorney to act on behalf of the family in the disposition of the family land, the Court of Appeal is right to hold that the sales so made cannot be set aside.?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


A SALE OF FAMILY LAND BY THE HEAD OF THE FAMILY WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF OTHER PRINCIPAL MEMBERS IS ONLY VOIDABLE AND NOT VOID


“It is well settled that a sale of family land by the head of family is only voidable where it is made without the concurrence of principal members of the family. Such a sale is not void but merely voidable. But where family property is sold by members of the family without the concurrence of the head of the family such a sale is void”…OGUNDARE JSC


CASES CITED


1   Ekpendu v. Erika (1959) 4 FSC 79; 2   City Property Development Ltd. v. Attorney-General of Lagos State (1976) 1 SC. 71, Solomon v. Mogaji (1982) 11 SC. 1, 7-10 69, 3 Lukan v. Ogunsusi (1972) 5 SC. 40 at pp.46-48.?


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

legaladmin

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

6 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

6 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

6 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago