Just Decided Cases

CHIEF KALU IGWE & ORS VS CHIEF OKUWA KALU & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1993-04) Legalpedia 39320 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden At Abuja

Fri Apr 2, 1993

Suit Number: SC 202/1990

CORAM


M.L. UWAIS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

S. KAWU JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

A.B. WALI JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

E.O. OGWUEGBU JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

S.U.MOHAMMED. JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


CHIEF KALU IGWE & ORS

APPELLANTS 


CHIEF OKUWA KALU & ORS

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


LAND LAW – TITLE TO LAND – APPEAL – INTERLOCUTORY INJUCTION

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellants were plaintiffs in consolidated suit involving a land matter in the trial court and the respondents were the defendants. Judgment was delivered in the consolidated suits against the appellants. The appellants appealed praying for a stay of execution and secondly for an interlocutory injunction. The first prayer was granted, while the second was dismissed, hence this appeal. 

 


HELD


The court held that the appellants appealed against the whole decision of the trial court and that there were special circumstances to warrant the preservation of the res pending appeal. It granted the application for interlocutory injunction with costs of N1, 000.00 in favour of the appellants.

 


ISSUES


1. Whether the Court of Appeal was right in holding that the appellants have not appealed against the dismissal of Suit No. HU/24/74 in which they (the appellants) were plaintiffs and consequently would not have a declaration of title in their favour if the appeal were allowed;

2. Whether there were no such special circumstances as would warrant the preservation of the res and the grant of an order of interlocutory injunction pending the determination of the appeal.”

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


DUTY OF COURT HAVING CUSTODY OF PROPERTY SUBJECT OF LITIGATION


The primary duty of the court having custody of property the subject matter of litigation is to preserve the res for delivery to persons who ultimately establish their title – Per Ogwuegbu, JSC.

 


TWO NOTICES OF APPEAL NEED NOT BE FILED IN CONSOLIDATED SUITS


There is no rule of law or practice requiring an aggrieved party in consolidated suits to file two notices of appeal -Per  Ogwuegbu, JSC.

 


CASES CITED


1. The Zamora (1916) A.C. 77.

2. Odusote v. Odusote (1971) N.M.L.R. 228,

3. Solanke v. Ajibola (1969) 1 N.M.L.R. 253

4. Ifediorah & ors v Ume and ors (1988) 2 N.W.L.R. (Pt.74) 5.

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO



CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT


legaladmin

Recent Posts

THE “PROOF-READY” LAWYER: 2026 EVIDENCE PRESERVATION CHECKLIST

A Practice Guide for Litigation, Corporate, and IP/Tech Departments OVERVIEW Under the current Nigerian legal…

6 days ago

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

6 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

6 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

6 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago