MICHEAL AIWORO VS THE STATE
July 21, 2025MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISES LTD & ANOR V JOHNATHAN OTUSANYA
July 21, 2025Legalpedia Citation: (2022-03) Legalpedia 16104 (SC)
In the Supreme Court of Nigeria
Holden At Lagos
Fri May 8, 1987
Suit Number: S.C. 186/1984
CORAM
BELLO, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT
OBASEKI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT
NNAMANI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT
KARIBI-WHYTE, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT
OPUTA, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT
PARTIES
CHIEF EBENEZER AWOTE & ORS
APPELLANTS
SUNMOLA KADIRI OWODUNNI & ANOR
RESPONDENTS
AREA(S) OF LAW
LAND LAW- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
SUMMARY OF FACTS
The Appellants claim for declaration, damages for trespass and injunction was dismissed by the Customary Court Grade A at Ijebu-ode, and it led to an appeal at the High Court which was allowed. The respondents aggrieved, appealed to the court of appeal which allowed it. The Appellants again dissatisfied and aggrieved have now appealed to the Supreme Court of Nigeria.
HELD
Allowing the appeal and ordering a retrial.
ISSUES
Not Available
RATIONES DECIDENDI
ONUS ON PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT ASKING FOR A DECREE OR DECLARATION OF TITLE
There is no doubt that the onus – (and a very heavy onus it is) is on a plaintiff/claimant asking for a decree or declaration of title to show clearly the area of land to which his claim relates.The plaintiff can do this by such oral description of the land that any Surveyor acting on such description can produce a plan of the land he claims Per Oputa JSC
PROOF OF IDENTITY AND EXTENT OF LAND
Another and perhaps better way of proving the identity and extent of the land claimed is by filing a plan reflecting all the features of the land and showing clearly the boundaries. Per Oputa JSC
PROOF OF BOUNDARY
Where the parties own land along a common boundary, it is necess-ary to show and prove the precise boundary features along that common boundary. Per Oputa JSC
ONUS FOR DECLARATION OF TITLE
In an action for declaration of title the onus is on the claimant to show clear title. If for any reason he fails to do that – like failure to establish precise boundaries as in this case – his claim fails. Per Oputa JSC
CASES CITED
Kojo v. Bonsie (1957) 1 W.L.R. 1223 at pp.1226/1227
Baruwa v Ogunshola (1938) 4 W.A.C.A. 159
Kwadzo v. Adjei (1944) 10 W.A.C.A. 274
Udofia AND anor v. Afia AND Ors. (1940) 6 W.A.C.A. 216.
Udekwu Amara v. Udogu Modekwu (1954) 14 W.A.C.A. 580
Okorie v. Udom 7 ors. (1960) 5 F.S.C. 162.
Aduke AND anor. v. Aiyelabola (1942) 8 W.A.C.A. 43 at p.45
Akinola AND anor. v. Oluwo AND ors (1962) W.N.L.R. 133 at p.134
J. M. Kodilinye v. Mbanefo Odu (1935) 2 W.A.C.A. 336 at pp. 337/338
Akinola & anor. v. Oluwo& Ors. (1962) W.N.L.R. 133 at p.134
STATUTES REFERRED TO
Supreme Court Act No. 12 of 1960
Supreme Court Rules 1985

