Just Decided Cases

CHIEF DAVIDSON OKAFOR IKEANYI VS AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK. LTD & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (1997) Legalpedia (SC) 85111

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Feb 14, 1997

Suit Number: SC. 200/1992

CORAM


S.M.A. BELGORE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

M.E. OGUNDARE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

E.O. OGWUEGBU, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

O. OLATAWURA, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


CHIEF DAVIDSON OKAFOR IKEANYI APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiff /appellant  instituted a civil action  against the defendants/respondents .His claim against the defendants jointly and severally is for:an order of court setting aside the purported sale of his property by the 1st defendant to the 2nd defendant on the ground that the said sale was fraudulent, made in an irregular manner and in contempt of the court  ?


HELD


It was for these reasons that I agreed on 18:11:96 that this appeal failed and that it should be dismissed with N1, 000.00 costs to each of the respondents.  ?


ISSUES


1. Whether there was advertisement of the sale, was there any sale by public auction of the property on 28:9:81 and whether the sale was made fraudulently, in an irregular manner and in contempt of court?2. Whether the judgment is against the weight of evidence on the question as to an auction sale having been held on 28th September, 1981?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


PARTIES ARE BOUND BY THEIR PLEADINGS


It is a settled principle of practice that parties are bound by their pleadings and cannot be allowed to set out in court a case at variance with their pleadings. PER OGWUEGBU, JSC.


RAISING AN ISSUE FOR THE FIRST TIME ON APPEAL


The normal rule is that a point presented for the first time in an appellate court should be jealously scrutinized and the appellate court can only decide in favour of the appellant on such a point if it is satisfied that it has before it all the facts bearing on the contention as completely as would have been the case if, the point had arisen at the trial and no satisfactory explanation could have been offered by those who conduct is impugned if an opportunity for explanation had been offered them. PER OGWUEGBU, JSC


CASES CITED


Fadiora v Gbadebo (1978) 1 L.R.N 97 at 108Metalimpex v A. G. Leventis & Co (Nigeria) Ltd (1976) All NLR 79George & Ors. v Dominion Flour mills Ltd (1963) 1 SCNLR 117Gates v Jacobs (1920) 1 Ch 567.?


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Anambra State Auctioneers Law Cap 12 laws of Anambra   ?


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

legaladmin

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

4 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

4 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

4 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 months ago